Manchester City Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY·ONS register: Local-authority-district·Social housing register: Local authority·NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACY·Local authority·North West England·Manchester·Ran 1 procurement for other authorities
Official UK PPONPLNV-8798-LDMPWebsitemanchester.gov.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 52 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
205 awarded tenders, 543 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
4 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEET Prevention & Reduction Service | 2 Nov 2026 | 6d | £3,043,200 |
| Youth Engagement Service/Integrated Settlement NEET | 9 Nov 2026 | 13d | £1,040,000 |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
85 Health and social work services45 procedures · 35% · 3 open79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting12 procedures · 9%45 Construction work10 procedures · 8%48 Software package and information systems10 procedures · 8%50 Repair and maintenance services9 procedures · 7%98 Other community, social and personal services7 procedures · 6% · 1 open71 Architectural, construction, engineering7 procedures · 6%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet7 procedures · 6%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 127 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract86%(109 notices)
109 of 127 notices are Contract (86%).Framework14%(18 notices)
18 of 127 notices are Framework (14%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open54%(68 notices)
68 of 127 notices are Open (54%).Route not published19%(24 notices)
24 of 127 notices are Route not published (19%).Limited / restricted14%(18 notices)
18 of 127 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).Direct award11%(14 notices)
14 of 127 notices are Direct award (11%).Selective2%(3 notices)
3 of 127 notices are Selective (2%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 52 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 32 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 127 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 35 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | 6 | 2.9% | 5 | 6 | — |
| Rosgal Limited | 6 | 2.9% | 3 | 6 | — |
| Great Places Housing Group Limited | 3 | 1.5% | 3 | 3 | 11 Feb 2026 |
| J. HOPKINS (CONTRACTORS) LIMITED | 3 | 1.5% | 2 | 4 | — |
| The Pankhurst Trust (incorporating Manchester Women's Aid) | 3 | 1.5% | 1 | 4 | 12 Feb 2026 |
| MoreLife (UK) Limited | 3 | 1.5% | 1 | 3 | — |
| MARSTON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED | 3 | 1.5% | 1 | 3 | 15 Oct 2025 |
| Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Ltd | 3 | 1.5% | 0 | 3 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 205 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 543 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated Drug & Alcohol Treatment & Support Service | Change Grow Live Services Limited | — | — | £37,312,167 † |
| TC718 Microsoft Products and Services | Phoenix Software Ltd | — | — | £31,900,000 † |
| Health Visitor Service | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £24,958,710 † |
| Repairs and Maintenance for the Manchester City Council Estate | Equans Services Limited | — | 2 yrs | £18,000,000 ≈ £9.0m/yr |
| The Northern - Integrated Sexual and Reproductive Health Service | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £15,091,216 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
475 of 562 contracts carry an end date, 428 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 258 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 301 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 475 of 562 published contracts have an end date; 428 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.