Plymouth Community Homes: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societySouth West EnglandPlymouth

Official UK PPONPQHR-8758-LZBNWebsiteplymouthcommunityhomes.co.uk ↗

Open now2next deadline 21 Nov 2028
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months75+29% vs prior 12 months (58)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot331.4% single-bid · 35 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 35 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share10%of 137 awarded procedures · 113 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

137 awarded tenders, 113 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4123 within 6 months · 5 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£28mnet · on 102 of 102 published values · top 5 = 49%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
General Building & Landscaping WorksDPS21 Nov 2028755d—

All 2 open notices for this authority →

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 133 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(130 notices)
    130 of 133 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 133 notices are Framework (2%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(1 notice)
    1 of 133 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award62%(82 notices)
    82 of 133 notices are Direct award (62%).
  • Open22%(29 notices)
    29 of 133 notices are Open (22%).
  • Limited / restricted11%(14 notices)
    14 of 133 notices are Limited / restricted (11%).
  • Route not published5%(7 notices)
    7 of 133 notices are Route not published (5%).
  • Selective1%(1 notice)
    1 of 133 notices is Selective (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 35 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=3531.4% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 15 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

66 daysrobust · n=15
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 133 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

023 of 133 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 13 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

5.6% below estimaterobust · n=13

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Neemar Search64.4%66—
Randall Simmonds LLP53.6%5519 Sept 2025
Softcat Plc32.2%33—
Classic Builders (South West) Ltd32.2%3320 Jul 2026
Airey & Coles32.2%3319 Sept 2025
BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LTD21.5%2419 Sept 2025
Vospers Motor Houseframework/DPS on 121.5%22—
R T J MARTIN LIMITED21.5%2212 May 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 10% of 137 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 113 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£28mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 102 of 102 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 49%; a further 18 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£68k middle valuerobust · n=102Middle half £44k–£175k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Pembroke Street Refurbishment ProjectBuildX (SW) Ltd——£5,365,607 †
Cecil Street, King Street and Neswick HouseBELL GROUP LTD7 Jul 20251.4 yrs£2,780,286
≈ £2.0m/yr
Claremont Street WorksMERCURY CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED17 Aug 202610 mo£2,553,710
Design & BuildRyearch Ltd28 Feb 20261.5 yrs£1,583,030
≈ £1.1m/yr
10-15 How Street, 10-15 Looe Street and 115-131 Vauxhall StreetBuildX (SW) Ltd7 Aug 20251.3 yrs£1,510,175
≈ £1.2m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

124 of 134 contracts carry an end date, 8 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 41 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 163 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Bampton Road, Plymouth PL6 8QBBuilding construction workAwarded / complete18 Jun 2026£0
Employers Agent - Bath StreetArchitecturalAwarded / complete18 Jun 2026—
Light Commercial VehicleMotor vehiclesAwarded / complete15 Jun 2026—
Ionisation System for the BeaconAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Ionisation SystemAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Pre market Engagement for Out of Hours Call ServiceTelephone-answering servicesPlanning29 May 2026£241,758
Ford Transit LeaderAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Claremont St CCTVAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Valuation ServicesAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
Softcat VMWare CloudAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
EA Services - Seabrook OrchardAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
Marlborough House ScaffoldAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
Standard EPCs ProgrammeEnergy and related servicesOpen18 May 2026£280,000
HR ConsultantAwarded / complete8 May 2026—
Postal and parcel delivery serviceAwarded / complete5 May 2026—
Commercial PortfolioSurvey servicesAwarded / complete1 May 2026£200,000
Out of Hours Call ServiceAwarded / complete30 Apr 2026—
Asbestos Waste DisposalAwarded / complete27 Apr 2026—
Lone WorkerAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026—
Heat Network - Metering and Billing OutsourcingAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026—

Search all 163 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 124 of 134 published contracts have an end date; 8 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.