THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationGreater LondonLondon

Companies House00977818 ↗Websitewestminster.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3-57% vs prior 12 months (7)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share30%of 10 awarded procedures · 55 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

10 awarded tenders, 55 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months21 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 10 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract70%(7 notices)
    7 of 10 notices are Contract (70%).
  • Framework30%(3 notices)
    3 of 10 notices are Framework (30%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open80%(8 notices)
    8 of 10 notices are Open (80%).
  • Selective10%(1 notice)
    1 of 10 notices is Selective (10%).
  • Route not published10%(1 notice)
    1 of 10 notices is Route not published (10%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 10 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 10 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
RG2 Maintenance and Construction Ltdframework/DPS on 2220%02—
CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1220%02—
Thor Fire Control Ltdframework/DPS on 2220%02—
EUROPEAN ASBESTOS SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1110%01—
ASPECT CONTRACTS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1110%01—
KPMG110%01—
BELL GROUP LTDframework/DPS on 1110%01—
Adrem Contracts Limitedframework/DPS on 1110%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 30% of 10 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 55 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

8 of 10 contracts carry an end date, 8 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Security Services 2023CIS Security Ltd7 Feb 2027 estimatedNot published
Furniture Supply Framework 2023Dams Furniture Limited, Quay Office Furnishers Ltd, Showcase PSR Portsdown Limited +224 Apr 2027 estimatedNot published

Recent procedures

Latest 29 of 29 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Reading List Management System TenderEducational software packageOpen7 Jun 2023—
Student Non Medical HelperAdult-education services at university levelOpen29 Mar 2023—
Harrow Sports HallModular and portable buildingsPlanned11 Nov 2022£1,000,000
E-Books/E-TextLibrary and archive servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2022—
Media Planning & Buying Services TenderAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2022—
Marylebone Halls RefurbishmentConstruction work for halls of residenceOpen19 Aug 2022—
29 Marylebone Road Expansion and RefurbishmentBuilding construction workOpen20 Jul 2022—
External Audit ServicesAuditing servicesAwarded / complete20 Jan 2022—
Recycling and Waste Services Tender14 lotsRefuse and waste related servicesOpen22 Sept 2021—

Search all 29 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 8 of 10 published contracts have an end date; 8 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.