Worcester City Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityWest MidlandsWorcester

Official UK PPONPWCP-1821-QDRP

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months32+167% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 57 awarded procedures · 54 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

57 awarded tenders, 54 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months208 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£3.9mnet · on 35 of 35 published values · top 5 = 53%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 44 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(44 notices)
    44 of 44 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open43%(19 notices)
    19 of 44 notices are Open (43%).
  • Limited / restricted23%(10 notices)
    10 of 44 notices are Limited / restricted (23%).
  • Direct award20%(9 notices)
    9 of 44 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Route not published11%(5 notices)
    5 of 44 notices are Route not published (11%).
  • Selective2%(1 notice)
    1 of 44 notices is Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 44 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

013 of 44 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

18.1% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
CLICK NETHERFIELD LIMITED23.5%22—
ABBEY & LYNDON BUILDERS LTD23.5%22—
caring for communities and people23.5%12—
Dragon Play and Sports11.8%12—
MAGGS DAY CENTRE11.8%11—
CIVICA ELECTION SERVICES LIMITED11.8%11—
G2V RECRUITMENT GROUP LIMITED11.8%11—
PRO ENVIRO LIMITED11.8%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 57 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 54 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.9mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 35 of 35 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 53%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£67k middle valuerobust · n=35Middle half £40k–£91k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Worcestershire Promoting Independent Living Service ExtensionMillbrook Healthcare Limited——£943,040 †
Worcester Event Security & StewardingEvent Support Team Limited—3 yrs · up to 4 yrs£520,000 †
≈ £173k/yr
Tender for Loose Equipment for Scala Arts Centre WorcesterAdlib Audio9 Jul 20262 mo£241,563
Perdiswell Pump Track Worcester ITTFOUR ONE FOUR LTD—2 mo£190,955 †
Comer Gardens Institute First Floor ConversionSnape Contracting Services Ltd—3 mo£178,224 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

48 of 57 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 20 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 69 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Removal of CrematorsAwarded / complete18 Aug 2025—
Annual canvass printing and postageAwarded / complete21 Jul 2025—
Supply of Robo Flaiil & attachmentsAwarded / complete1 Jul 2025—
Astwood Crematorium Electric Cremator ProcurementConstruction work for crematoriumsAwarded / complete13 Jun 2025£1,800,000
Worcestershire Promoting Independant Living Service ExtensionAdministrative housing servicesAwarded / complete11 Apr 2025—
Electrical Services and Minor Works ContractElectrical servicesAwarded / complete10 Apr 2025£600,000
Building Repairs & Maintenance and Minor Works ContractRepair and maintenance services for pumpsAwarded / complete9 Apr 2025£2,000,000
Worcester Performing Arts CentreAuditorium construction workAwarded / complete11 Feb 2025£9,000,000
Appointment of QS and PM Services for Astwood CrematoriumArchitecturalAwarded / complete9 Jul 2024£150,000
Appointment of Multi Discipline Design Services for Astwood Crematorium Tintern Ave, Astwood Rd., Worcester WR3 8HAArchitectural and related servicesAwarded / complete18 Jun 2024£300,000

Search all 69 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 48 of 57 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.