Agricultural and horticultural products: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 03100000·Supplies · class·in Agricultural, farming, fishing, forestry and related products
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
03100000 Agricultural and horticultural products18 notices · 82%- Tree-nursery products 31 · 12m
- Wood 13 · 12m
- Horticultural and nursery products 9 · 12m
- Cattle, livestock and small animals 8 · 12m
- Crops, products of market gardening and horticulture 6 · 12m
- Animal products and related products 5 · 12m
- Vegetables, fruits and nuts 4 · 12m
- Forestry and logging products 3 · 12m
- Pulp 1 · 12m
- Coffee beans 1 · 12m
- All of Agricultural, farming, fishing, forestry and related products →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Local authorities55%(12 notices)
12 of 22 notices are Local authorities (55%).Other public bodies14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Other public bodies (14%).Central government14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Central government (14%).Education & universities9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Education & universities (9%).Not classified9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Not classified (9%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| London Borough of Hillingdon | Local authorities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| AGRI-EPI CENTRE LIMITED | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ANSA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED | Other public bodies | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Angus Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Belfast City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Defra Network eTendering Portal | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Durham County Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| East Ayrshire Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Forestry and Land Scotland | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Government Commercial Agency | Central government | 1 | 1 | 0 |
21 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 17 of 22 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| South East England | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract64%(14 notices)
14 of 22 notices are Contract (64%).Framework32%(7 notices)
7 of 22 notices are Framework (32%).Dynamic purchasing system5%(1 notice)
1 of 22 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (5%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open59%(13 notices)
13 of 22 notices are Open (59%).Limited / restricted14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).Route not published14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Route not published (14%).Direct award9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Direct award (9%).Selective5%(1 notice)
1 of 22 notices is Selective (5%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold50%(2 notices)
2 of 4 notices are Above threshold (50%).Below threshold50%(2 notices)
2 of 4 notices are Below threshold (50%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 23 awards to 15 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Origin Amenity Solutions | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| East Riding Horticulture | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Richard Aitken Seedsmen Ltd | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Avatan Handling Equipment Ltd | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bowman Garden Machinery Ltd | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Frank Sutton | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| George Brown Ltd | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Hannas Nurseries | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 9 of 22 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 0310. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2022 to 19 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.