Carter Brown – The Expert Service Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Companies House: Private Limited Company·Birmingham·West Midlands·Main market: Data-processing services
Companies House04547728 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.
Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.
A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
10 awards (8 for a named lot, 80%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 10 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7231 Data-processing services1 awards · 10% · awards naming a lot7512 Administrative services of agencies1 awards · 10% · awards naming a lot7523 Justice services1 awards · 10% · awards naming a lot8512 Medical practice and related services1 awards · 10% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Assessments | Sefton Council | — | 1 yrs | £29,999 † ≈ £30k/yr |
| Psychological reporting | London Borough of Bexley | — | 1 yrs | £25,000 † ≈ £25k/yr |
| NEPO605A - Children's Advocacy, Independent People for Children and Adults Complaints and Secure Reviews - Opening 6 | Newcastle City Council | — | — | £0 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 8 of 8 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority90%(9 awards)
9 of 10 awards are Local authority (90%).Central government10%(1 awards)
1 of 10 awards are Central government (10%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norfolk County Council | 1 | 12.5% | 3 | 13 Dec 2022 |
| Sefton Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 Dec 2025 |
| London Borough of Bexley | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 Apr 2026 |
| Newcastle City Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 14 Feb 2025 |
| Stockton on Tees Borough Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 Nov 2022 |
| Ministry of Justice | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 24 Mar 2026 |
| Kent County Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 11 Mar 2026 |
| The North Yorkshire Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 14 Mar 2023 |
Share = of the 8 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
8 of 10 awards carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Assessments | 1 Dec 2026 | £29,999 |
| Approved Providers List for the provision of Therapeutic Support Services | 31 Mar 2027 | £30,000,000 |
| Psychological reporting | 31 Mar 2027 | £25,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 10 of 10 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 10 awards, estimated from the published duration on 4 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.