Envar Composting Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyASHFORD, KENTSouth East EnglandMain market: Refuse and waste related services

Companies House04272075 ↗

Procedures with an award717 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities5named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£27mnet · on 14 of 17 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 24 Feb 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1end date on 15 of 17 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions2most often East of England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

17 awards (15 for a named lot, 88%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 17 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

9050 Refuse and waste related services5 awards · 29% · awards naming a lot
9051 Refuse disposal and treatment3 awards · 18% · 1 awards naming a lot + 2 whole-procedure awards
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£27mOn 14 of 17 award records; the five largest make 70%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£1.6m middle valuerobust · n=14
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 5 wins across all categories.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5compared within all comparable wins
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Lot 2: Treatment of Green Waste Only – ECC – 20,000 tonnes per annumEssex County Council——£7,011,635 †
Lot 1: Treatment of Mixed Food and Green Waste – ECC – 20,000 tonnes per annumEssex County Council——£3,900,000 †
Dacorum Borough CouncilHertfordshire County Council——£2,799,225 †
Lot 2 Lowestoft Transfer StationSuffolk County Council——£2,797,641 †
Lot 2: Treatment of Mixed Food and Green Waste – 14,000 tonnes per annumEssex County Council——£2,730,000 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

East of England6 procedures · 86%
South East England1 procedure · 14%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Local authority94%(16 awards)
    16 of 17 awards are Local authority (94%).
  • Type not classified6%(1 award)
    1 of 17 awards is Type not classified (6%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Hertfordshire County Council228.6%920 Sept 2024
Essex County Council228.6%324 Mar 2023
Suffolk County Council114.3%224 Feb 2025
Milton Keynes Councilframework/DPS on 1114.3%215 Apr 2016
Norse Commercial Services Ltdframework/DPS on 1114.3%11 Oct 2024

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

15 of 17 awards carry an end date, 14 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Lot 2: Treatment of Green Waste Only – ECC – 20,000 tonnes per annum31 Mar 2028£7,011,635

Recent awards

Latest 17 of 17 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Hemel HempsteadHertfordshire County CouncilNot published£61,665 †
from the contract notice
ElstreeHertfordshire County CouncilNot published£49,250 †
from the contract notice
Lot 1: Treatment of Mixed Food and Green Waste – ECC – 20,000 tonnes per annumEssex County CouncilNot published£3,900,000 †
from the contract notice
Lot 2: Treatment of Mixed Food and Green Waste – 14,000 tonnes per annumEssex County CouncilNot published£2,730,000 †
from the contract notice
Lot 2: Treatment of Green Waste Only – ECC – 20,000 tonnes per annumEssex County CouncilNot published£7,011,635 †
from the contract notice
Interim Food and Garden Waste Treatment ContractMilton Keynes CouncilNot published£6,000,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Interim Food and Garden Waste Treatment ContractMilton Keynes CouncilNot published£8,080,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 17 awards, estimated from the published duration on 14 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.