TEC Partnership: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Further educationOther public bodyYorkshire and the HumberGrimsby

Official UK PPONPCJJ-5724-XHGMWebsitetecpartnership.com ↗

Open now2next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months12-14% vs prior 12 months (14)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot730% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share27%of 15 awarded procedures · 17 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 17 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£1.4mnet · on 9 of 9 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 26 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract88%(23 notices)
    23 of 26 notices are Contract (88%).
  • Framework12%(3 notices)
    3 of 26 notices are Framework (12%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open92%(24 notices)
    24 of 26 notices are Open (92%).
  • Direct award8%(2 notices)
    2 of 26 notices are Direct award (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7robust · n=1030% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

16 daysrobust · n=11
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 26 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 26 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 7 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

21.6% below estimaterobust · n=7

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
F R Townsendframework/DPS on 1213.3%228 Jan 2026
Gough and Kelly Ltd16.7%112 Jul 2025
Biffa Waste Services Ltd16.7%1118 Aug 2025
MHR International UK Limited16.7%114 Jun 2025
The Content Marketing Agency16.7%1115 Sept 2025
Edwards & George Electrical Contractorsframework/DPS on 116.7%118 Jan 2026
Franks Portlock Consulting Limited16.7%117 Jul 2026
One Advanced16.7%1117 Jun 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 27% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 17 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 9 of 9 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£98k middle valuerobust · n=9Middle half £39k–£155k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
TEC Partnership - On-Site Security ScarboroughConstant Security Services12 Feb 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£587,930
≈ £294k/yr
Finance SoftwareOne Advanced—5 yrs£229,000
≈ £46k/yr
TEC-WCS-25Biffa Waste Services Ltd18 Aug 20252 yrs · up to 3 yrs£155,078
≈ £78k/yr
Marketing Design & Web Maintenance 2025The Content Marketing Agency15 Sept 20252 yrs · up to 3 yrs£120,000
≈ £60k/yr
TEC Partnership - Replacement Switch Gear and Associated Cable WorksF R Townsend15 Jul 20251 mo£98,220

Recent procedures

Latest 34 of 34 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Electrical Switchgear & Associated CablingElectrical installation workPlanned9 Jun 2025£50,000
HR & Payroll SystemAwarded / complete4 Jun 2025—
TEC Partnership - Pest Control Services 2025Pest-control servicesOpen28 Apr 2025£40,000
TEC Partnership - Grounds Maintenance 2025Grounds maintenance servicesOpen27 Mar 2025£150,000
Skegness TEC Constructioncentral purchasing bodyConstruction workAwarded / complete17 Jul 2024—
STEC Hospitality and Workshop RoofRoof works and other special trade construction worksAwarded / complete5 Jul 2023—
AO17 Skills KitchenRefurbishment workOpen26 Apr 2023—
TEC - Partnership - Grimsby Learning Shop RefurbishmentRefurbishment workOpen17 Mar 2023—
TEC Partnership Condition Survey 2023Architectural and building-surveying servicesOpen21 Feb 2023—
TEC Partnership - Proposed Construction of new Skegness TEC CampusConstruction work for buildings of further educationOpen29 Nov 2022—
TEC Partnership - Waste Contract V2Refuse and waste related servicesOpen15 Mar 2022—
TEC Partnership - Waste ContractRefuse and waste related servicesCancelled14 Mar 2022—

Search all 34 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 1 of 2 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.