Transport Focus: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPGBR-3271-MNXJWebsitetransportfocus.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months7+40% vs prior 12 months (5)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£230knet · on 8 of 8 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 12 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(12 notices)
    12 of 12 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open83%(10 notices)
    10 of 12 notices are Open (83%).
  • Direct award8%(1 notice)
    1 of 12 notices is Direct award (8%).
  • Route not published8%(1 notice)
    1 of 12 notices is Route not published (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

8indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 12 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

0.56 of 12 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Phoenix Software Ltd112.5%11—
BEYOND WORDS STUDIO LIMITED112.5%11—
SOMETHING INC LIMITED112.5%11—
Migo Consult112.5%11—
GGI Development and Research LLP112.5%11—
Thomas Ableman Limited (Trading as Freewheeling)112.5%11—
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER112.5%1129 Jan 2026
Wavenet112.5%1120 Mar 2025

8 awarded procedures across 8 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£230kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 8 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£15k middle valuerobust · n=8Middle half £14k–£52k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Qualitative Research - British Sign Language Users on RailUNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER29 Jan 20263 mo£60,000
Lenovo LaptopsWavenet20 Mar 2025—£58,200
Rail Customer Experience Survey data visualisation and communications supportBEYOND WORDS STUDIO LIMITED—4 mo£50,000 †
Microsoft M365 LicensingPhoenix Software Ltd—1 yrs£15,000 †
≈ £15k/yr
Advice on Staffing and Technical Needs for a New Data ServiceMigo Consult—1 mo · up to 0.2 yrs£14,750 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

7 of 7 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Microsoft M365 LicensingPhoenix Software Ltd31 May 2027£15,000

Recent procedures

Latest 17 of 17 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Qualitative Research - British Sign Language Users on RailResearch servicesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026£60,000
Microsoft M365 LicensingSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete7 Apr 2026£15,000
Brand Identity Development for the New Passenger WatchdogMarketing servicesAwarded / complete24 Feb 2026£15,000
Rail Customer Experience Survey data visualisation and communications supportBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete17 Feb 2026£50,000
Lenovo LaptopsHardwareOpen17 Feb 2026£40,000
Webinar Programme SupportBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete3 Feb 2026£5,000
Board Effectiveness ReviewAwarded / complete15 Dec 2025—
Advice on Staffing and Technical Needs for a New Data ServiceSystems consultancy servicesAwarded / complete3 Dec 2025£20,000
Lorry Driver Facilities Survey Year Threecentral purchasing bodyMarket research servicesOpen9 May 2025£330,000
Board Effectiveness ReviewGeneral management consultancy servicesOpen10 Apr 2025£18,333
Lenovo LaptopsAwarded / complete24 Mar 2025—
Lenovo laptopsHardwareOpen7 Mar 2025£70,000
Strategic Roads User Survey 2025-2027central purchasing bodyMarket research servicesOpen13 Sept 2024£700,000
Provision of Motorway Services User Survey research between 2024 to 2026central purchasing bodyMarket research servicesOpen1 Nov 2023£750,000
Riders, Walkers and Wheelers Research 2023/2024central purchasing bodyMarket research servicesOpen1 Aug 2023£123,000
Lorry driver facilities survey roll outMarket research servicesOpen3 Feb 2023£330,000
Your Bus Journeycentral purchasing bodyResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesOpen16 Jun 2022£1,500,000

Search all 17 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 7 of 7 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.