Operation of water supplies: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 65130000Services · classin Public utilities

Open now1open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months87 contracting authorities · 24 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Other public bodies42%(10 notices)
    10 of 24 notices are Other public bodies (42%).
  • Central government17%(4 notices)
    4 of 24 notices are Central government (17%).
  • Local authorities17%(4 notices)
    4 of 24 notices are Local authorities (17%).
  • Education & universities13%(3 notices)
    3 of 24 notices are Education & universities (13%).
  • Not classified13%(3 notices)
    3 of 24 notices are Not classified (13%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustCentral government300
Southern Water Services LimitedOther public bodies300
United Utilities Water LimitedOther public bodies320
B3Livingnot classified200
Denbighshire County CouncilLocal authorities200
Anchor Hanover GroupOther public bodies100
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardEducation & universities110
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustCentral government110
CADENT GAS LIMITEDOther public bodies100
Flintshire County CouncilLocal authorities100

16 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 16 of 24 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South East England6 · 38%———
East of England6 · 38%———
Greater London5 · 31%———
South West England4 · 25%———
North West England4 · 25%———
East Midlands4 · 25%———
West Midlands4 · 25%———
Wales (Cymru)4 · 25%———
North East England3 · 19%———
Yorkshire and the Humber3 · 19%———
Scotland1 · 6%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract75%(18 notices)
    18 of 24 notices are Contract (75%).
  • Framework25%(6 notices)
    6 of 24 notices are Framework (25%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open38%(9 notices)
    9 of 24 notices are Open (38%).
  • Route not published21%(5 notices)
    5 of 24 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Direct award17%(4 notices)
    4 of 24 notices are Direct award (17%).
  • Selective17%(4 notices)
    4 of 24 notices are Selective (17%).
  • Limited / restricted8%(2 notices)
    2 of 24 notices are Limited / restricted (8%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold100%(5 notices)
    5 of 5 notices are Above threshold (100%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

32 daysrobust · n=5middle value, notice to deadline

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 13 awards to 13 suppliers

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 7 of 24 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

JAGGAER / BravoSolution2 notices · 29%
Proactis / ProContract2 notices · 29%
SAP Ariba1 notice · 14%
Sell2Wales1 notice · 14%
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 6513. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 7 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.