Specialist agricultural or forestry machinery: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 16600000·Supplies · class·in Agricultural machinery
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 12 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
16600000 Specialist agricultural or forestry machinery18 notices · 72%- Mowers 33 · 12m
- Tractors 20 · 12m
- Agricultural and forestry machinery for soil preparation or cultivation 3 · 12m
- Miscellaneous gardening equipment 2 · 12m
- Seeders, planters or transplanters 2 · 12m
- Lawn or sports-ground rollers 1 · 12m
- Harvesting and threshing machinery 1 · 12m
- Haymaking machinery 1 · 12m
- Pick-up balers 1 · 12m
- Spraying machinery for agriculture or horticulture 1 · 12m
- All of Agricultural machinery →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Other public bodies32%(8 notices)
8 of 25 notices are Other public bodies (32%).Central government28%(7 notices)
7 of 25 notices are Central government (28%).Local authorities8%(2 notices)
2 of 25 notices are Local authorities (8%).Education & universities4%(1 notice)
1 of 25 notices is Education & universities (4%).Not classified28%(7 notices)
7 of 25 notices are Not classified (28%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forestry Commission | Other public bodies | 7 | 3 | 0 |
| NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal) | not classified | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| Forestry and Land Scotland | Central government | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| AHDB | not classified | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| DAERA - Forest Service | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Forestry England | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Leicester City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Thurrock Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| University of Exeter | Central government | 1 | 1 | 0 |
12 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 17 of 25 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| South East England | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract96%(24 notices)
24 of 25 notices are Contract (96%).Framework4%(1 notice)
1 of 25 notices is Framework (4%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open56%(14 notices)
14 of 25 notices are Open (56%).Route not published20%(5 notices)
5 of 25 notices are Route not published (20%).Direct award12%(3 notices)
3 of 25 notices are Direct award (12%).Limited / restricted12%(3 notices)
3 of 25 notices are Limited / restricted (12%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold17%(1 notice)
1 of 6 notices is Above threshold (17%).Below threshold83%(5 notices)
5 of 6 notices are Below threshold (83%).
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (15) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
6 of 11 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 4 more give no procedure and are left out.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 20 awards to 18 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Björkemar Construction & Consulting (BCC AB) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| JOHN DEERE FORESTRY LTD | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ABA Groundcare (SW) Ltd | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bjorkemar Construction and Consulting AB | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Blue Machinery (Scotland) Ltd | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Bowring Transport Ltd t/a B&B Tractors | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ernest Doe & Sons Ltd | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| George Browns Limited | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 7 of 25 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 1660. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 14 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.