Daisy Corporate Services Trading Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Companies House: Private Limited Company·Solihull·West Midlands·Main market: Local area network services
Companies House02888250 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
19 awards (16 for a named lot, 84%, 3 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 19 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7271 Local area network services5 awards · 26% · awards naming a lot3241 Local area network1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot3242 Network equipment1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot5031 Maintenance and repair of office machinery1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot6420 Telecommunications services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot7222 Systems and technical consultancy services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot9834 Accommodation and office services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO0169 Contact Centre and Telephony Services | Essex County Council | — | — | £2,840,053 † |
| Recovery Suite Services | UK DEBT MANAGEMENT OFFICE | — | — | £186,950 † |
| TfGM PSTN Network Services | Transport for Greater Manchester | — | — | £177,472 † |
| 2 years support for Mitel MX-One 4.1 telephone system as per attached quote, 1 Aug 2024 to 31 July 2026 | THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM | — | — | £72,894 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 11 of 11 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Type not classified63%(12 awards)
12 of 19 awards are Type not classified (63%).Central government11%(2 awards)
2 of 19 awards are Central government (11%).Local authority11%(2 awards)
2 of 19 awards are Local authority (11%).NHS & health11%(2 awards)
2 of 19 awards are NHS & health (11%).Education5%(1 awards)
1 of 19 awards are Education (5%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cantium Business Solutions Limited | 1 | 9.1% | 5 | 5 Mar 2025 |
| YPO | 1 | 9.1% | 4 | 19 Dec 2023 |
| National Highways Limited | 1 | 9.1% | 2 | 13 Sept 2022 |
| Essex County Council | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 22 Feb 2023 |
| UK DEBT MANAGEMENT OFFICE | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 21 Sept 2022 |
| Transport for Greater Manchester | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 24 Jan 2023 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 24 Jul 2024 |
| Darlington Borough Council | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 27 Nov 2024 |
Share = of the 11 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
12 of 19 awards carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Lot 1 - Cloud Hosting Service | 15 Oct 2027 | £120,000,000 |
| Lot 2 - Cloud Support Services | 15 Oct 2027 | £120,000,000 |
| Lot 4 - Data Centre Solutions, Design & Build | 15 Oct 2027 | £120,000,000 |
| Lot 6 - Colocation Services | 15 Oct 2027 | £120,000,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 19 of 19 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 10 of 19 awards, estimated from the published duration on 2 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.