Nomensa Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Companies House: Private Limited Company·Bristol·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Data services
Companies House04214477 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
10 awards (8 for a named lot, 80%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 10 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7230 Data services2 awards · 20% · awards naming a lot7223 Custom software development services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot7241 Provider services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot7330 Design and execution of research and development1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot7934 Advertising and marketing services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot8510 Health services1 award · 10% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 72). Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apprenticeship Service User Centred Design Services | Department for Education | — | 2.5 yrs | £6,600,000 † ≈ £2.6m/yr |
| Live Running Services for the Apprenticeship Service | Department for Education | — | 2.5 yrs | £3,125,000 † ≈ £1.3m/yr |
| User Research Capability Contract | Department of Health & Social Care | — | 7 mo | £1,750,000 † |
| 2223-30-RCM-LJ WEB DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT and CONSULTANCY SERVICES | Sheffield Hallam University | — | — | £1,041,667 † |
| EFM Research Audit | NHS England | — | 1 mo | £30,210 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 9 of 9 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Central government50%(5 awards)
5 of 10 awards are Central government (50%).Type not classified20%(2 awards)
2 of 10 awards are Type not classified (20%).Education10%(1 award)
1 of 10 awards is Education (10%).Local authority10%(1 award)
1 of 10 awards is Local authority (10%).NHS & health10%(1 award)
1 of 10 awards is NHS & health (10%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department for Education | 2 | 22.2% | 2 | 21 Nov 2022 |
| The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) | 2 | 22.2% | 2 | 13 Jan 2025 |
| National Highways Limited | 1 | 11.1% | 2 | 13 Sept 2022 |
| Department of Health & Social Care | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 30 Jul 2021 |
| Sheffield Hallam University | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 12 Dec 2023 |
| NHS England | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 29 Oct 2025 |
| Essex County Council | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 20 Sept 2024 |
Share = of the 9 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
8 of 10 awards carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Design Research Framework | 23 Oct 2027 estimated | £5,000,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 10 of 10 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 10 awards, estimated from the published duration on 4 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.