Advertising and marketing services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 79340000Services · classin Business Services & Consultancy

Open now34open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months572325 contracting authorities · 1,703 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot417% single-bid · 211 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 246 lots from 211 competitions run by 167 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 140 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 106 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£150,000middle value of 637 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 637 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award46 daysmiddle value · 130 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 130 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 34 open for bids now · newest first

See all 34 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities27%(449 notices)
    449 of 1,655 notices are Local authorities (27%).
  • Central government23%(375 notices)
    375 of 1,655 notices are Central government (23%).
  • Other public bodies19%(309 notices)
    309 of 1,655 notices are Other public bodies (19%).
  • Education & universities16%(270 notices)
    270 of 1,655 notices are Education & universities (16%).
  • Housing associations2%(26 notices)
    26 of 1,655 notices are Housing associations (2%).
  • Not classified14%(226 notices)
    226 of 1,655 notices are Not classified (14%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
British CouncilLocal authorities31140
AHDBnot classified2390
Waste & Resources Action ProgrammeOther public bodies2080
ORDNANCE SURVEY LIMITEDOther public bodies1950
Transport for LondonOther public bodies1840
Ministry of DefenceCentral government1660
Swansea UniversityEducation & universities1570
NS&ICentral government1260
Norfolk County CouncilLocal authorities1250
VisitBritain/VisitEnglandnot classified1210

700 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 1,040 of 1,703 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Greater London222 · 21%553%57%
South East England184 · 18%562%18%
North West England168 · 16%560%31%
South West England156 · 15%767%19%
West Midlands154 · 15%565%13%
Yorkshire and the Humber152 · 15%468%20%
East of England151 · 15%459%8%
North East England140 · 13%560%20%
East Midlands133 · 13%569%13%
Scotland106 · 10%779%39%
Northern Ireland101 · 10%489%95%
Wales (Cymru)91 · 9%461%58%

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract86%(1,472 notices)
    1,472 of 1,703 notices are Contract (86%).
  • Framework13%(222 notices)
    222 of 1,703 notices are Framework (13%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(9 notices)
    9 of 1,703 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open43%(733 notices)
    733 of 1,703 notices are Open (43%).
  • Route not published17%(284 notices)
    284 of 1,703 notices are Route not published (17%).
  • Selective15%(263 notices)
    263 of 1,703 notices are Selective (15%).
  • Direct award14%(230 notices)
    230 of 1,703 notices are Direct award (14%).
  • Limited / restricted11%(193 notices)
    193 of 1,703 notices are Limited / restricted (11%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold64%(263 notices)
    263 of 410 notices are Above threshold (64%).
  • Below threshold36%(147 notices)
    147 of 410 notices are Below threshold (36%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

31 daysrobust · n=351middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (921) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=246
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid17%(43)
    43 of 246 lots fall in 1 bid (17%).
  • 2–322%(54)
    54 of 246 lots fall in 2–3 (22%).
  • 4–628%(69)
    69 of 246 lots fall in 4–6 (28%).
  • 7 or more33%(80)
    80 of 246 lots fall in 7 or more (33%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £45,000middle value £150,000p75 £577,000
interquartile range of 637 awards · p90 £3,923,077
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 246 lots from 211 competitions run by 167 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 140 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 106 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=211middle half 2–8
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

469 of 845 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 76 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

56%robust · n=845
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

975 SME bids out of 1,216, on 211 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

80%robust · n=1,216
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

278 of 461 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

60%robust · n=461
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

58%robust · n=382winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 193 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

at the estimaterobust · n=19338 below · 27 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

21 of 921 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

2%robust · n=921
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 123 lots from 47 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

8robust · n=47106 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 1,409 awards to 851 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 8% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 620 of 1,703 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

In-tend Electronic Procurement133 notices · 21% · 3 open
Proactis / ProContract85 notices · 14% · 2 open
JAGGAER / BravoSolution76 notices · 12% · 2 open
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)69 notices · 11% · 2 open
Delta eSourcing60 notices · 10% · 1 open
eTendersNI44 notices · 7%
Sell2Wales35 notices · 6%

Open tenders in advertising and marketing services

34 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Media BuyingAFFINITY WATER LIMITED2 Nov 20266d£6,000,000
Creative Advertising AgencyAFFINITY WATER LIMITED2 Nov 20266d£3,200,000
Marketing, Advertising and Media Buying Services - Wirral Met CollegeWirral Metropolitan College6 Nov 202610d£92,000
Large Format, Out of Home Advertising - North Shields Transport HubNorth Tyneside Council6 Nov 202610d£60,000
Copywriting Services FrameworkFrameworkHeritage Fund6 Nov 202610d£40,000 ceiling
Provision of Workwear Clothing & Promotional Items - UoB2 lotsUniversity of Bedfordshire9 Nov 202613d£437,500
Patient Experience and FFT PlatformHampshire and isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust9 Nov 202613d£166,500
Digital Media Planning and Buying Services2 lotsSRUC11 Nov 202615d£320,000
T26-080BUS Place Based Perception Research and Strategic Alignment StudyDerry City and Strabane District Council13 Nov 202617d£84,000
CM3601 Marketing ServicesFramework2 lotsYORKSHIRE WATER SERVICES LIMITED13 Nov 202617d£14,250,000 ceiling
Contract for the Provision of Digital Marketing Tourism & Economic Development ServicesPetersfield Town Council15 Nov 202619d£54,000
AT1541 - Marketing and Creative Agency SupportLondon Luton Airport Limited17 Nov 202621d£576,000
Communications and Engagement FrameworkFramework4 lotsLiverpool City Council20 Nov 202624d£16,400,000 ceiling
Station AdvertisingNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED20 Nov 202624d£1,900,000,000
T1053 - Media Partner FrameworkFrameworkCo-Ownership Housing23 Nov 202627d£1,300,000 ceiling
Out of Home Advertising for Glasgow SubwayStrathclyde Partnership for Transport25 Nov 202629d£10,000,000
CRM partner agency tenderSOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY LIMITED15 Dec 202649d£1,378,656
The City of Liverpool College Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) Marketing and CommunicationsDPS4 lotsThe City of Liverpool College31 Jul 2027277d£150,000 ceiling
London and Quadrant Housing Trust - Marketing Suites and Signage Dynamic Purchasing SystemDPS10 lotsLONDON & QUADRANT HOUSING TRUST4 Oct 20311,803d—
Marketing & Communications - Dynamic Market IntentionDPS7 lotsSouthern Water Services Limitednot published——

All 34 open notices with CPV 7934… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7934. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 26 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.