Recruitment services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 79600000Services · classin Business Services & Consultancy

Open now17open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months551272 contracting authorities · 1,236 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot710% single-bid · 49 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 67 lots from 49 competitions run by 43 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 50 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 5.5) and 17 from older notices (bids received, middle 11).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£60,000middle value of 597 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 597 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award62 daysmiddle value · 36 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 36 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 17 open for bids now · newest first

See all 17 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities27%(324 notices)
    324 of 1,199 notices are Local authorities (27%).
  • Other public bodies25%(301 notices)
    301 of 1,199 notices are Other public bodies (25%).
  • Central government23%(273 notices)
    273 of 1,199 notices are Central government (23%).
  • Education & universities14%(167 notices)
    167 of 1,199 notices are Education & universities (14%).
  • Police, fire & emergency3%(33 notices)
    33 of 1,199 notices are Police, fire & emergency (3%).
  • Not classified8%(101 notices)
    101 of 1,199 notices are Not classified (8%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Transport for Greater ManchesterOther public bodies66420
Sheffield City CouncilLocal authorities34180
Oxford City CouncilLocal authorities31180
University of the West of EnglandEducation & universities2520
Anchor Hanover GroupOther public bodies1470
Ministry of DefenceCentral government1410
ST CLARE CATHOLIC MULTI ACADEMY TRUSTOther public bodies13130
Construction Industry Training BoardOther public bodies1140
Driver and Vehicle Standards AgencyCentral government1160
Plymouth Community HomesOther public bodies1170

529 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 801 of 1,236 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
North West England212 · 26%635%20%
South East England202 · 25%555%17%
South West England178 · 22%760%6%
Greater London173 · 22%543%46%
East Midlands172 · 21%549%8%
East of England159 · 20%557%13%
West Midlands153 · 19%1050%10%
Yorkshire and the Humber143 · 18%555%13%
North East England137 · 17%544%10%
Scotland56 · 7%———
Wales (Cymru)35 · 4%——13%
Northern Ireland32 · 4%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract83%(1,031 notices)
    1,031 of 1,236 notices are Contract (83%).
  • Framework14%(178 notices)
    178 of 1,236 notices are Framework (14%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(27 notices)
    27 of 1,236 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award27%(330 notices)
    330 of 1,236 notices are Direct award (27%).
  • Open22%(278 notices)
    278 of 1,236 notices are Open (22%).
  • Limited / restricted21%(254 notices)
    254 of 1,236 notices are Limited / restricted (21%).
  • Route not published19%(237 notices)
    237 of 1,236 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Selective11%(137 notices)
    137 of 1,236 notices are Selective (11%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold79%(104 notices)
    104 of 132 notices are Above threshold (79%).
  • Below threshold21%(28 notices)
    28 of 132 notices are Below threshold (21%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

31 daysrobust · n=139middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (839) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=67
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid10%(7)
    7 of 67 lots fall in 1 bid (10%).
  • 2–315%(10)
    10 of 67 lots fall in 2–3 (15%).
  • 4–621%(14)
    14 of 67 lots fall in 4–6 (21%).
  • 7 or more54%(36)
    36 of 67 lots fall in 7 or more (54%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £33,060middle value £60,000p75 £150,000
interquartile range of 597 awards · p90 £713,666
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 67 lots from 49 competitions run by 43 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 50 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 5.5) and 17 from older notices (bids received, middle 11).

Last 36 months.

7robust · n=49middle half 4–11
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

149 of 695 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 144 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

21%robust · n=695
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

260 SME bids out of 413, on 59 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

63%robust · n=413
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

208 of 469 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

44%robust · n=469
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

39%robust · n=450winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 44 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

at the estimaterobust · n=4412 below · 0 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

11 of 839 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

1%robust · n=839
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 154 lots from 33 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

15robust · n=3384 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 1,084 awards to 522 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 14% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 244 of 1,236 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

In-tend Electronic Procurement47 notices · 19% · 2 open
Proactis / ProContract32 notices · 13% · 1 open
Delta eSourcing30 notices · 12%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution28 notices · 11%
Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)28 notices · 11% · 1 open
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management20 notices · 8% · 1 open
eTendersNI14 notices · 6%

Open tenders in recruitment services

17 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Recruitment Services for Deliberative EngagementScottish Parliamentary Corporate Body2 Nov 20267d—
Executive Recruitment FrameworkFrameworkStoke on Trent City Council10 Nov 202615d£168,000 ceiling
HCC - 10/26 - The Provision of a Recruitment Agency FrameworkFramework7 lotsHertfordshire County Council20 Nov 202625d£46,000,000 ceiling
Education Recruitment Advertising and Resourcing Services5 lotsSouthern Universities Management Services (SUMS)19 Feb 2027116d£80,000,000
Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) of Temporary Agency, Contractor and Interim Agencies for Preferred Supplier Listing (PSL) Status for Luton Borough Council - Y21001DPSLuton and Kent Commercial Services LLP30 Jan 2028461d£150,000,000 ceiling
CHIC Agency - Dynamic Purchasing System [DPS]DPS8 lotsCommunities and Housing Investment Consortium Limited ("CHIC")27 Oct 2028732d£80,000,000 ceiling
Staffing Solutions DPS (Dynamic purchasing system)DPS7 lotsIpswich Borough Council31 Dec 2028797d—
Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) of Temporary Agency, Contractor and Interim Agencies for Preferred Supplier Listing (PSL) Status for Hackney Borough Council – Y25013DPSHackney and Kent commercial Services (t/a Connect2Hackney)16 Jan 2029813d£180,000,000 ceiling
WCC - Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Second Tier Agency Staffing RequirementsDPS18 lotsWarwickshire County Council23 Feb 2029851d£50,000,000 ceiling
Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) of Temporary Agency, Contractor and Interim Agencies for Preferred Supplier Listing — Y20010DPSCantium Business Solutions Limited23 Feb 2029851d£500,000,000 ceiling
Temporary Worker Agencies and Interim Contractors/Consultants for Preferred Supplier Listing Status for Dorset Unitary Council Y24006DPSDorset & Kent Commercial Services LLP T/A Connect2Dorset2 Apr 2029889d£250,000,000 ceiling
Recruitment Agency ServicesDPS9 lotsProcurement Assist Limited c/o Integrated Facilities Management Bolton Ltd (iFM Bolton)31 May 2029948d£75,000,000 ceiling
Invitation to join a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) of Temporary Agency, Contractor and Interim Agencies for Preferred Supplier Listing (PSL) Status for Halton Borough Council – Y25002DPSHalton Borough Council and Commercials Services Kent Ltd t/a Connect2Halton30 Aug 20301404d£100,000,000 ceiling
Recruitment servicesDPSBromford Flagship LiveWest Limited23 May 20311670d£10,000,000 ceiling

All 17 open notices with CPV 7960… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7960. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 25 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.