Elmbridge Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandEsherRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPNNR-6659-GVMN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months20+33% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£529mnet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 35 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(34 notices)
    34 of 35 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system3%(1 notice)
    1 of 35 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open86%(30 notices)
    30 of 35 notices are Open (86%).
  • Selective6%(2 notices)
    2 of 35 notices are Selective (6%).
  • Route not published6%(2 notices)
    2 of 35 notices are Route not published (6%).
  • Limited / restricted3%(1 notice)
    1 of 35 notices is Limited / restricted (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

21 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 35 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

07 of 35 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.9% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
BILL KEAR PLANT & AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTORS LIMITED233.3%2219 Sept 2025
VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED116.7%113 Aug 2026
ETEC CONTRACT SERVICES LTD116.7%11—
I & J Bushell Limited116.7%1118 Sept 2025
KOMPAN Limited116.7%116 Oct 2025

6 awarded procedures across 5 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£529mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£139k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £90k–£1.1m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Elmbridge, Mole Valley, Surrey Heath and Woking Joint Waste Collection and Street Cleaning Services ContractVEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED3 Aug 20267 yrs · up to 21 yrs£526,947,718
≈ £75m/yr
Hurst Pool Refurbishment WorksETEC CONTRACT SERVICES LTD—5 mo£1,470,048 †
EBC HW Brooklands Community Park Ditch and Pond RestorationBILL KEAR PLANT & AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTORS LIMITED18 Sept 20252 mo£180,000
EBC EC Oatlands Recreation Ground Sand Pit and Play EquipmentKOMPAN Limited6 Oct 20254 mo£98,469
EBC HW Procurement of Old Cranleighans Tarmac Track Ditton CommonBILL KEAR PLANT & AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTORS LIMITED19 Sept 20252 mo£87,110

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

2 of 2 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Hurst Pool Refurbishment WorksETEC CONTRACT SERVICES LTD25 Jan 2027£1,470,048

Recent procedures

Latest 40 of 39 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
EBC PR Hersham Recreation Ground, Runway ReplacementConstruction workOpen26 Feb 2026£170,000
EBC PR Molesey Hurst, Outdoor Gym Replacement.Construction workOpen26 Feb 2026£56,000
Elmbridge Local Infrastructure Organisation ContractBusiness organisation servicesPlanning22 Oct 2025—
EBC EC Oatlands Recreation Ground Sand Pit and Play EquipmentLandscaping work for playgroundsAwarded / complete6 Oct 2025£100,000
EBC HW Procurement of Old Cranleighans Tarmac Track Ditton CommonFootpath construction workAwarded / complete19 Sept 2025£20,000
EBC HW Brooklands Community Park Ditch and Pond RestorationFlatwork for parksAwarded / complete19 Sept 2025£20,000
EBC HW Horse Ride and Path Surfacing ProjectFootpath construction workAwarded / complete18 Sept 2025£20,000
EBM MB Baker Street Car Park ResurfacingResurfacing worksOpen15 Jul 2025£100,000
Walton Road Car Park East Molesey -Resurfacing/OverlayingConstructionOpen1 Jul 2025£100,000
EBC PR Churchfields Recreation Ground Play AreaLandscaping work for playgroundsOpen25 Jun 2025£200,000
Local Housing Needs AssessmentResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesOpen28 May 2025£40,000
Gypsy & Traveller Needs AssessmentAdministrative social servicesOpen28 May 2025£40,000
EBC MB - Marlborough House Steel & Concrete RepairsConcrete repair workOpen23 Apr 2025£60,000
EBC - MB - Mayfield Road Car Park Re-surfacingResurfacing worksOpen17 Apr 2025£200,000
EBC PR Procurement of Giggs Hill Field, Play Area, Refurbishment.Playground equipmentOpen24 Mar 2025£84,000
EBC Cleaning Services3 lotsCleaning and sanitation servicesOpen1 Nov 2024—
EBC EC Procurement of Play Equipment10 lotsPlayground climbing apparatusOpen10 Jan 2022£353,000
EBC EC Grounds Maintenance Tender4 lotsGrounds maintenance servicesOpen10 Dec 2021£6,792,000
EBC - TE/NS - Water Hygiene Services Term ContractWater distribution and related servicesOpen15 Apr 2021£100,000
EBC EC Procurement and Installation of bins2 lotsConstruction structures and materials; auxiliary products to construction (except electric apparatus)Open15 Apr 2021£340,000

Search all 39 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 2 of 2 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.