Fenland District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of EnglandMarch

Official UK PPONPGPJ-1712-LJNHWebsitefenland.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months20+122% vs prior 12 months (9)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot1100% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 30 awarded procedures · 44 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

30 awarded tenders, 44 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months41 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£130knet · on 2 of 2 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 29 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(27 notices)
    27 of 29 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(2 notices)
    2 of 29 notices are Framework (7%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award45%(13 notices)
    13 of 29 notices are Direct award (45%).
  • Open31%(9 notices)
    9 of 29 notices are Open (31%).
  • Route not published14%(4 notices)
    4 of 29 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Limited / restricted10%(3 notices)
    3 of 29 notices are Limited / restricted (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1moderate · n=3100% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

22 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 29 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 29 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
LINDUM GROUP LIMITEDframework/DPS on 126.7%248 Sept 2026
Foster Building Services LTDframework/DPS on 113.3%1321 Oct 2025
Aspire Adaptations Ltdframework/DPS on 113.3%1321 Oct 2025
Chas D. Allflatt Limitedframework/DPS on 113.3%1321 Oct 2025
Eastfield Guest House Limitedframework/DPS on 113.3%12—
Fenland Residential Limitedframework/DPS on 113.3%12—
RBS Property Managementframework/DPS on 113.3%12—
ROOFLINK INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL LIMITED13.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 30 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 44 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£130kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 2 of 2 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 22 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Marine InsuranceArthur J. Gallagher (UK) Limited—1 yrs£87,589 †
≈ £88k/yr
Ecology SupportG2—6 mo£42,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

20 of 29 contracts carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 40 of 40 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
11-12 High Street, WisbechAwarded / complete13 Nov 2025—
Sewage Treatment Works Replacement Scheme 2025/26Construction works for sewage treatment plantsAwarded / complete12 Nov 2025£250,000
East Cambridgeshire District Council Home Improvement Agency Disabled Adaptions FrameworkFramework4 lotsBathrooms construction workAwarded / complete21 Oct 2025£8,000,000
Landscape Planning SupportAwarded / complete25 Sept 2025—
FEN_FACT_2025Awarded / complete25 Sept 2025—
Marine InsuranceAwarded / complete8 Sept 2025—
Fenland Bulking Invitation to Tender - Waste Transfer Stations2 lotsRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete20 Aug 2025£1,344,000
Ecology SupportAwarded / complete8 Jul 2025—
Tender for Emergency AccommodationFrameworkHotel servicesAwarded / complete25 Mar 2025—
Cemetery Administration SoftwareSoftware package and information systemsOpen15 Aug 2024—
2024 Insurance Services Tender7 lotsAccident insurance servicesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2024—
Tender for Emergency AccommodationHotelOpen29 Feb 2024—
The Provision of a Migrant Support Service for FenlandHealth and social work servicesOpen8 Nov 2023—
Home Improvement Agency ServiceHome-help servicesOpen4 Oct 2023—
Tankering, Sewage and Effluent Removal ServicesSewage servicesAwarded / complete29 Aug 2023—
Concrete Repairs to Suspended Concrete Quay, Wisbech Port, CambridgeshireConcrete repair workAwarded / complete29 Aug 2023£1,000,000
Fenland Group ~ Catering TenderSchool catering servicesAwarded / complete21 Jul 2023£1,426,560
Whittlesey Relief Road Strategic Outline Business CaseTransport systems consultancy servicesOpen24 May 2023—
Home Improvement Agency ServiceHome-help servicesOpen20 Oct 2022£6,000,000
South Fens Enterprise Park Design and BuildIndustrial units construction workOpen31 May 2022—

Search all 40 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 20 of 29 published contracts have an end date; 1 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.