Peak District National Park Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: OtherONS register: National-park-authorityOther public bodyEast MidlandsBakewell

Official UK PPONPRMG-9537-GCRD

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months14-30% vs prior 12 months (20)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share21%of 29 awarded procedures · 41 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

29 awarded tenders, 41 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months147 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£14mnet · on 27 of 27 published values · top 5 = 89%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 34 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(31 notices)
    31 of 34 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(3 notices)
    3 of 34 notices are Framework (9%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open88%(30 notices)
    30 of 34 notices are Open (88%).
  • Direct award6%(2 notices)
    2 of 34 notices are Direct award (6%).
  • Selective6%(2 notices)
    2 of 34 notices are Selective (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1.5indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

22 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 34 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

121 of 34 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.6% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
RIVER STEWARDSHIP COMPANY LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1310.3%2426 Sept 2025
Micropropagation Services (E.M.) Ltdframework/DPS on 1310.3%2412 Apr 2026
ELMS contracting ltdframework/DPS on 126.9%2426 Sept 2025
T.S.L. CONTRACTORS LTD.framework/DPS on 126.9%2425 Sept 2025
Conservefor Ltdframework/DPS on 126.9%2426 Sept 2025
Michael Wynneframework/DPS on 126.9%2426 Sept 2025
A. H. HELICOPTER SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 126.9%2325 Sept 2025
UPLAND ENVIRONMENTAL LTDframework/DPS on 126.9%2326 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 29 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 41 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£14mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 27 of 27 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 89%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£65k middle valuerobust · n=27Middle half £45k–£127k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
MFF162 Supply and delivery of sphagnum moss plugsMicropropagation Services (E.M.) Ltd8 Sept 20255.9 yrs£8,430,000
≈ £1.4m/yr
MFF164-01 aerial works 2025-28T.S.L. CONTRACTORS LTD.—1 mo£3,100,000 †
MFF167 2025-2028 Moorland Restoration Ground WorksELMS contracting ltd—1 mo£271,840 †
Warslow Moors Estate Wader Protection Plan ProjectRangemoor Countryside Management3 Aug 20262.5 yrs · up to 4.5 yrs£232,994
≈ £93k/yr
MFF167 2025-2028 Moorland Restoration Ground WorksConservefor Ltd—1.8 yrs£226,813 †
≈ £124k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

51 of 51 contracts carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 39 of 39 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Monsal Trail - Scaling to Rock Cuttings PM03511/25/05Geotechnical engineering servicesAwarded / complete6 Jan 2026£50,000
2470/TrentabankOverhaul and refurbishment workAwarded / complete15 Dec 2025£45,000
PM09742/25/05 Tissington Station - Car Park ResurfacingResurfacing worksOpen27 Nov 2025£30,000
06351/Fieldhead Campsite PodsElectrical installation workAwarded / complete24 Nov 2025£80,000
MFF166 2025-2027 Supply and Delivery of SeedAgricultural and horticultural productsOpen19 Nov 2025£45,000
PD BIKES 26BicyclesOpen18 Nov 2025£121,000
9804/North Lees CampsiteCar park building construction workAwarded / complete3 Nov 2025£25,000
Monsal Trail - Devegetation works PM03511/25/06Site preparation and clearance workOpen9 Oct 2025£35,000
Longdendale TPT Access WorksResurfacing worksOpen26 Sept 2025£50,000
Modern.Gov hosting, annual support and maintenanceAwarded / complete2 Sept 2025—
Morridge Hill Country Habitat Restoration TenderEnvironmental servicesAwarded / complete19 Aug 2025£50,000
Retail Management and Merchandising Services for the Peak District National Park AuthorityBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete12 Aug 2025£20,000
MORRIDGE HILL COUNTRY LEGAL AND GOVERNANCE PACKAGELegal servicesAwarded / complete12 Aug 2025£42,000
Settlement Analysis and Capacity AssessmentsArchitecturalAwarded / complete15 Jul 2025£60,000
Cleaning Services - Peak District National Park Public Toilets, Visitor Centres, Offices, Ranger Bases and Campsite including provision of all consumablesCleaning servicesAwarded / complete8 May 2024£205,000
MFF 142 2023-2025 Moorland Restoration Ground Works15 lotsEnvironmental improvement worksOpen23 Jun 2023—
MFF 133 2022-2025 package 58 lotsEnvironmental improvement worksAwarded / complete5 Dec 2022£1,500,000
Supply of Bikes Framework 2021-2025Framework4 lotsBicyclesAwarded / complete12 Jan 2022£400,000
Supply and Delivery of Sphagnum Moss Plug PlantsAgriculturalAwarded / complete14 Jun 2021£850,000

Search all 39 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 51 of 51 published contracts have an end date; 1 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.