THE HORNIMAN PUBLIC MUSEUM AND PUBLIC PARK TRUST: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Companies House02456393 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3-62% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot90% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Published award value, 24m£850knet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(10 notices)
    10 of 11 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(1 notice)
    1 of 11 notices is Framework (9%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open82%(9 notices)
    9 of 11 notices are Open (82%).
  • Selective18%(2 notices)
    2 of 11 notices are Selective (18%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

9robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

33 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

17 of 11 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

10.9% below estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
PRINGLE RICHARDS SHARRATT LIMITED120%1130 Jul 2025
VERTEX SERVICES GROUP LIMITED120%1111 Aug 2025
RELIANCE HIGH-TECH LIMITED120%1127 Oct 2025
Powell System Engineering Ltd120%1115 Sept 2025
Rose Refurbishment & Construction Ltd120%111 Dec 2025

5 awarded procedures across 5 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£850kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£92k middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £70k–£167k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Estates Maintenance Services and Project WorkVERTEX SERVICES GROUP LIMITED11 Aug 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£476,655
≈ £159k/yr
Horniman Museum BMS System UpgradePowell System Engineering Ltd15 Sept 20256 mo£167,483
CUE & Butterfly House DecarbonisationPRINGLE RICHARDS SHARRATT LIMITED30 Jul 20252.6 yrs£91,827
≈ £36k/yr
Horniman Garden ToiletsRose Refurbishment & Construction Ltd1 Dec 20253 mo£69,716
Horniman CCTV Recording Platform replacementRELIANCE HIGH-TECH LIMITED27 Oct 20253.4 yrs · up to 5.4 yrs£44,535
≈ £13k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 11 of 11 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
SCC Spirit Store Container ReplacementFrameworkConstruction work for research buildingsOpen1 Oct 2026£110,000
CUE & Butterfly House DecarbonisationConstruction workOpen31 Mar 2026£900,000
Collections Management System ReplacementDatabase and operating software packageOpen11 Dec 2025£96,000
Garden ToiletsRefurbishment workAwarded / complete10 Dec 2025£75,000
Horniman CCTV Recording Platform replacementClosed-circuit surveillance systemAwarded / complete28 Oct 2025£50,000
Repair and replacement of timber open balcony on CUE buildingConstruction work for art and cultural buildingsOpen16 Oct 2025£40,000
Horniman Museum BMS System UpgradeFacilities management software package and software package suiteAwarded / complete16 Sept 2025£140,000
CUE & Butterfly House DecarbonisationArchitecturalAwarded / complete13 Aug 2025£150,000
Procurement of Services and Project Works for Estate MaintenanceBuilding and facilities management servicesAwarded / complete11 Aug 2025£1,000,000
NEAZ Café kitchen fit outInstallation of fitted kitchensOpen23 Jul 2025£80,000
AV software services: Nature & Love (N+L)Software programming and consultancy servicesOpen11 Nov 2024£180,000

Search all 11 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.