Coffee, tea and related products: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 15860000·Supplies · class·in Food, beverages, tobacco and related products
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 4 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 1 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 7) and 4 from older notices (bids received, middle 5.5).
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 10 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
15860000 Coffee, tea and related products26 notices · 68%15861000 Coffee6 notices · 16%15861100 Roasted coffee4 notices · 11%15861200 Decaffeinated coffee4 notices · 11%15862000 Coffee substitutes1 notices · 3%15863000 Tea1 notices · 3%15865000 Herbal infusions1 notices · 3%- Miscellaneous food products and dried goods 25 · 12m
- Bread products, fresh pastry goods and cakes 18 · 12m
- Miscellaneous food products 12 · 12m
- Meat 9 · 12m
- Assorted dairy products 9 · 12m
- Non-alcoholic beverages 8 · 12m
- Animal products, meat and meat products 6 · 12m
- Milk and cream 5 · 12m
- Cocoa; chocolate and sugar confectionery 5 · 12m
- Dairy products 4 · 12m
- All of Food, beverages, tobacco and related products →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Education & universities35%(13 notices)
13 of 37 notices are Education & universities (35%).Local authorities35%(13 notices)
13 of 37 notices are Local authorities (35%).Central government14%(5 notices)
5 of 37 notices are Central government (14%).NHS & health11%(4 notices)
4 of 37 notices are NHS & health (11%).Other public bodies5%(2 notices)
2 of 37 notices are Other public bodies (5%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leeds City Council | Local authorities | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust | Central government | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Manchester Metropolitan University C/O Pelican Procurement Services | Education & universities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Nottingham City Council | Local authorities | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| The Common Services Agency (more commonly known as NHS National Services Scotland) ("NSS") | NHS & health | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| University of Central Lancashire | Education & universities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| University of Glasgow | Education & universities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Bromford Flagship LiveWest Limited | Other public bodies | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
30 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 31 of 38 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract71%(27 notices)
27 of 38 notices are Contract (71%).Framework29%(11 notices)
11 of 38 notices are Framework (29%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open53%(20 notices)
20 of 38 notices are Open (53%).Route not published16%(6 notices)
6 of 38 notices are Route not published (16%).Limited / restricted13%(5 notices)
5 of 38 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).Direct award11%(4 notices)
4 of 38 notices are Direct award (11%).Selective8%(3 notices)
3 of 38 notices are Selective (8%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold100%(4 notices)
4 of 4 notices are Above threshold (100%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (16) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 4 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 1 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 7) and 4 from older notices (bids received, middle 5.5).
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
7 of 13 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 3 more give no procedure and are left out.
i
What share of bids come from small and medium firms.
SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.
16 SME bids out of 30, on 5 lots where the buyer published the split.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 29 awards to 20 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Algie & Company Ltd | 6 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| COSTA LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| The Nairobi Coffee & Tea Co Ltd | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Matthew Algie & Co Ltd | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 200 Degrees Coffee Roasters | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bewleys Tea & Coffee | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Costa Coffee | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 14 of 38 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 1586. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 21 Sept 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.