Internet development services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 72420000Services · classin IT Services & Software

Open now0no tender open for bids right now
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months33 contracting authorities · 26 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot15 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 3 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. All 5 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£60,000middle value of 11 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 11 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government36%(9 notices)
    9 of 25 notices are Central government (36%).
  • Local authorities20%(5 notices)
    5 of 25 notices are Local authorities (20%).
  • Police, fire & emergency12%(3 notices)
    3 of 25 notices are Police, fire & emergency (12%).
  • Education & universities8%(2 notices)
    2 of 25 notices are Education & universities (8%).
  • NHS & health4%(1 notices)
    1 of 25 notices are NHS & health (4%).
  • Not classified20%(5 notices)
    5 of 25 notices are Not classified (20%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Defra Network eTendering Portalnot classified300
Ministry of DefenceCentral government300
Royal Berkshire Fire AuthorityPolice, fire & emergency200
UK Research and InnovationCentral government200
British Transport PolicePolice, fire & emergency100
Choice Housingnot classified100
Ensemble Purchasingnot classified100
Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilLocal authorities110
NHS EnglandCentral government100
NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement ServicesNHS & health100

20 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 14 of 26 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South East England4 · 29%———
Greater London3 · 21%———
West Midlands2 · 14%———
Wales (Cymru)1 · 7%———
Northern Ireland1 · 7%———
East Midlands1 · 7%———
Yorkshire and the Humber1 · 7%———
East of England1 · 7%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(24 notices)
    24 of 26 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(2 notices)
    2 of 26 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Selective31%(8 notices)
    8 of 26 notices are Selective (31%).
  • Open27%(7 notices)
    7 of 26 notices are Open (27%).
  • Limited / restricted19%(5 notices)
    5 of 26 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).
  • Direct award12%(3 notices)
    3 of 26 notices are Direct award (12%).
  • Route not published12%(3 notices)
    3 of 26 notices are Route not published (12%).

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (14) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £52,150middle value £60,000p75 £1,620,182
interquartile range of 11 awards · p90 £3,888,000
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 3 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. All 5 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.

Last 36 months.

1robust · n=5middle half 1–4
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

6 of 13 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 1 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

46%robust · n=13

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 22 awards to 21 suppliers

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 7 of 26 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Delta eSourcing2 notices · 29%
JAGGAER / BravoSolution1 notices · 14%
myTenders1 notices · 14%
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7242. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 29 Jan 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.