Aston University: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Companies House: Royal Charter Company·Birmingham·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Consultative engineering and construction services
Official UK PPONPTLB-7496-TPTR
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.
Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.
A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
19 awards (15 for a named lot, 79%, 4 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 19 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7131 Consultative engineering and construction services3 awards · 16% · awards naming a lot7311 Research services3 awards · 16% · awards naming a lot8053 Vocational training services3 awards · 16% · 1 awards naming a lot + 2 whole-procedure awards7960 Recruitment services1 award · 5% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 3 wins in its industry (CPV division 71). Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UKSPF Business Support Decarbonisation Net Zero Programme | West Midlands Combined Authority | — | — | £1,930,831 † |
| UKSPF Business Support Decarbonisation Net Zero Programme | West Midlands Combined Authority | — | — | £1,639,262 † |
| UKSPF Business Support Decarbonisation Net Zero Programme | West Midlands Combined Authority | — | — | £523,907 † |
| Psychological Interventions Validation Agreement | Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust | 1 Jan 2026 | 5 yrs | £44,250 ≈ £9k/yr |
| TARIC Data | Department for Business & Trade | — | 7 mo | £41,666 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 15 of 15 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Type not classified42%(8 awards)
8 of 19 awards are Type not classified (42%).Local authority32%(6 awards)
6 of 19 awards are Local authority (32%).Central government26%(5 awards)
5 of 19 awards are Central government (26%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education England | 3 | 20% | 3 | 23 May 2022 |
| Department for Business & Trade | 2 | 13.3% | 2 | 20 Feb 2026 |
| Yorkshire Purchasing Organisation | 2 | 13.3% | 2 | 14 Jul 2023 |
| West Midlands Combined Authority | 1 | 6.7% | 3 | 13 Mar 2023 |
| The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) | 1 | 6.7% | 2 | 31 Aug 2023 |
| Telford and Wrekin Council | 1 | 6.7% | 2 | 17 Jan 2023 |
| Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 1 Jan 2026 |
| Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust | 1 | 6.7% | 1 | 31 Jul 2025 |
Share = of the 15 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
9 of 19 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| YPO - 001086 Apprenticeships | 31 Jul 2027 | £10,000,000,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 19 of 19 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 9 of 19 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.