Freeths LLP: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Companies House: Limited Liability Partnership·Nottingham·East Midlands·Main market: Legal services
Official UK PPONPPCM-1511-PDGH
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.
Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.
A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
57 awards (49 for a named lot, 86%, 8 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 57 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7910 Legal services45 awards · 79% · 40 awards naming a lot + 5 whole-procedure awards7911 Legal advisory and representation services8 awards · 14% · 5 awards naming a lot + 3 whole-procedure awards4521 Building construction work1 awards · 2% · awards naming a lot7914 Legal advisory and information services1 awards · 2% · awards naming a lot7994 Collection agency services1 awards · 2% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Support | WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED | — | 2 mo | £90,000 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 31 of 31 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Bidding recordi
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 6 notices name this supplier, covering 13 lots since 20 Jan 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.
Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.
i
How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.
Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.
| Notice | Authority | Outcome | Bidders | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homes England Legal Services Framework 2026-2030 | Homes England (the name adopted by the Homes and Communities Agency) | undecided | 20 | 16 Oct 2026 |
| National Framework for Developer Led Schemes | YPO | appointed | 76 | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Legal Panel for Public Sector | Government Commercial Agency | appointedall 5 lots bid for | 86 | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Supply of Legal Services 2 | Cantium Business Solutions Limited | appointed | 6 | 4 Sept 2026 |
| LBLA Legal Services Framework | London Borough of Haringey | appointed to 1 of 3 lots | 27 | 14 Apr 2026 |
| LEGAL SERVICES PA23 | LUPC Ltd | appointed | 21 | 20 Jan 2026 |
Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority39%(22 awards)
22 of 56 awards are Local authority (39%).Education27%(15 awards)
15 of 56 awards are Education (27%).Type not classified11%(6 awards)
6 of 56 awards are Type not classified (11%).Central government9%(5 awards)
5 of 56 awards are Central government (9%).Other public body9%(5 awards)
5 of 56 awards are Other public body (9%).NHS & health5%(3 awards)
3 of 56 awards are NHS & health (5%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Trent University | 2 | 6.5% | 6 | 6 Feb 2026 |
| Cornwall Council | 2 | 6.5% | 6 | 14 Mar 2025 |
| Sefton Council | 2 | 6.5% | 3 | 28 Jun 2024 |
| LUPC Ltd | 2 | 6.5% | 2 | 5 Sept 2025 |
| University of Essex | 1 | 3.2% | 6 | 10 Jun 2025 |
| Government Commercial Agency | 1 | 3.2% | 5 | 17 Jul 2026 |
| Surrey County Council | 1 | 3.2% | 5 | 21 Nov 2025 |
| NHS Shared Business Services Limited | 1 | 3.2% | 3 | 4 Sept 2023 |
Share = of the 31 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
41 of 58 awards carry an end date, 24 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Full Service (England and Wales) | 2 Dec 2026 estimated | £6,000,000 |
| Lot 5, Benefit Administration, Employer Bodies and Governance (England and Wales) | 2 Dec 2026 estimated | £6,000,000 |
| Legal Services | 15 Jun 2027 | £100,000 |
| Legal Recovery & Collection | 14 Aug 2027 estimated | £17,000,000 |
| Procurement, Commercial & Contract | 14 Aug 2027 estimated | £17,000,000 |
| Property & Construction | 14 Aug 2027 estimated | £17,000,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 58 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 17 of 58 awards, estimated from the published duration on 24 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.