Analytical, scientific, mathematical or forecasting software package: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 48460000Services · classin Software Packages & ERP

Open now2open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months2014 contracting authorities · 43 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical contract value£40,530middle value of 20 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 20 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

1 of 2 open for bids now · newest first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Cryptoasset Investigation Services2 lotsHM Revenue & Customs9 Nov 202614d£3,933,000

See all 2 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government47%(20 notices)
    20 of 43 notices are Central government (47%).
  • Education & universities19%(8 notices)
    8 of 43 notices are Education & universities (19%).
  • Other public bodies16%(7 notices)
    7 of 43 notices are Other public bodies (16%).
  • Police, fire & emergency2%(1 notices)
    1 of 43 notices are Police, fire & emergency (2%).
  • Local authorities2%(1 notices)
    1 of 43 notices are Local authorities (2%).
  • Not classified14%(6 notices)
    6 of 43 notices are Not classified (14%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
UK Research and InnovationCentral government1370
University of DundeeEducation & universities200
HM Revenue & CustomsCentral government111
Aberystwyth Innovation and Enterprise Campus Ltdnot classified100
Anglian Water ServicesOther public bodies100
BLUELIGHT COMMERCIAL LIMITEDOther public bodies110
Birmingham Airport Limitednot classified100
CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITEDOther public bodies110
Crown Prosecution ServiceCentral government100
De Montfort UniversityEducation & universities110

30 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 24 of 43 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South East England5 · 21%———
Greater London4 · 17%———
Scotland3 · 13%———
Wales (Cymru)3 · 13%———
East of England2 · 8%———
Yorkshire and the Humber2 · 8%———
West Midlands2 · 8%———
South West England2 · 8%———
North West England1 · 4%———
East Midlands1 · 4%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(42 notices)
    42 of 43 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(1 notices)
    1 of 43 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award44%(19 notices)
    19 of 43 notices are Direct award (44%).
  • Limited / restricted26%(11 notices)
    11 of 43 notices are Limited / restricted (26%).
  • Selective14%(6 notices)
    6 of 43 notices are Selective (14%).
  • Route not published9%(4 notices)
    4 of 43 notices are Route not published (9%).
  • Open7%(3 notices)
    3 of 43 notices are Open (7%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold100%(4 notices)
    4 of 4 notices are Above threshold (100%).

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (29) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £18,223middle value £40,530p75 £79,943
interquartile range of 20 awards · p90 £283,778
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

2 of 29 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

7%robust · n=29
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

4 of 16 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

25%robust · n=16
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

30%robust · n=10winner registered in the delivery region
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

0 of 29 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

0%robust · n=29

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 33 awards to 33 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 19% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 6 of 43 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

SAP Ariba1 notices · 17% · 1 open

Open tenders in analytical, scientific

2 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Cryptoasset Investigation Services2 lotsHM Revenue & Customs9 Nov 202614d£3,933,000

All 2 open notices with CPV 4846… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 4846. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 22 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.