Cleaning and polishing products: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 39800000Supplies · classin Furniture (incl. office furniture), furnishings, domestic appliances (excl. lighting) and cleaning products

Open now1open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months88 contracting authorities · 40 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot77 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from 7 competitions run by 7 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 3 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 13) and 4 from older notices (bids received, middle 5.5).

Last 36 months.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities38%(14 notices)
    14 of 37 notices are Local authorities (38%).
  • Education & universities11%(4 notices)
    4 of 37 notices are Education & universities (11%).
  • Other public bodies8%(3 notices)
    3 of 37 notices are Other public bodies (8%).
  • Central government8%(3 notices)
    3 of 37 notices are Central government (8%).
  • NHS & health5%(2 notices)
    2 of 37 notices are NHS & health (5%).
  • Not classified30%(11 notices)
    11 of 37 notices are Not classified (30%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
YPOnot classified500
Procurement and Logistics Servicenot classified300
APUC LtdOther public bodies100
Bolsover District CouncilLocal authorities100
Braintree District CouncilLocal authorities100
Business Services Organisation, Procurement and Logistics Servicenot classified100
Cardiff and Vale University Health BoardCentral government110
Ceredigion County CouncilLocal authorities110
Chorley CouncilLocal authorities110
Cyngor GwyneddOther public bodies100

34 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 35 of 40 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Yorkshire and the Humber11 · 31%———
Wales (Cymru)6 · 17%———
Northern Ireland6 · 17%———
North West England5 · 14%———
East Midlands5 · 14%———
South West England5 · 14%———
Greater London4 · 11%———
South East England3 · 9%———
North East England3 · 9%———
East of England2 · 6%———
West Midlands2 · 6%———
Scotland1 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract68%(27 notices)
    27 of 40 notices are Contract (68%).
  • Framework33%(13 notices)
    13 of 40 notices are Framework (33%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open75%(30 notices)
    30 of 40 notices are Open (75%).
  • Selective15%(6 notices)
    6 of 40 notices are Selective (15%).
  • Route not published8%(3 notices)
    3 of 40 notices are Route not published (8%).
  • Limited / restricted3%(1 notice)
    1 of 40 notices is Limited / restricted (3%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold73%(8 notices)
    8 of 11 notices are Above threshold (73%).
  • Below threshold27%(3 notices)
    3 of 11 notices are Below threshold (27%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

35 daysrobust · n=8middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (16) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from 7 competitions run by 7 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 3 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 13) and 4 from older notices (bids received, middle 5.5).

Last 36 months.

7robust · n=7middle half 5–13
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

16 of 16 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

100%robust · n=16
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

46 SME bids out of 61, on 7 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

75%robust · n=61

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 82 awards to 41 suppliers

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 25 of 40 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract9 notices · 36%
Sell2Wales5 notices · 20%
eTendersNI3 notices · 12%
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 3980. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 26 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.