Computer audit and testing services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 72800000·Services · class·in IT Services & Software
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 11 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
72800000 Computer audit and testing services18 notices · 82%- Systems and technical consultancy services 832 · 12m
- Software-related services 806 · 12m
- Programming services of packaged software products 518 · 12m
- Data-processing services 165 · 12m
- Data services 157 · 12m
- System and support services 148 · 12m
- Software programming and consultancy services 130 · 12m
- Provider services 107 · 12m
- Database services 81 · 12m
- Internet services 44 · 12m
- All of IT Services & Software →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Central government50%(11 notices)
11 of 22 notices are Central government (50%).Local authorities14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Local authorities (14%).Police, fire & emergency9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Police, fire & emergency (9%).Education & universities9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Education & universities (9%).Other public bodies9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Other public bodies (9%).Not classified9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Not classified (9%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency | Central government | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| National Crime Agency | Central government | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust | Central government | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Translink | Other public bodies | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| University Hospitals Birmingham on behalf of | Education & universities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Digital Health & Care Wales | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Information Commissioner’s Office | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| London Borough of Barnet | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| The Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk | Police, fire & emergency | 1 | 0 | 0 |
15 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 14 of 22 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| South East England | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract95%(21 notices)
21 of 22 notices are Contract (95%).Framework5%(1 notices)
1 of 22 notices are Framework (5%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open41%(9 notices)
9 of 22 notices are Open (41%).Limited / restricted41%(9 notices)
9 of 22 notices are Limited / restricted (41%).Route not published14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Route not published (14%).Direct award5%(1 notices)
1 of 22 notices are Direct award (5%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold100%(2 notices)
2 of 2 notices are Above threshold (100%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (16) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
7 of 16 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 14 awards to 10 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver and Vehicle Standards Angency | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| MTI Technology ltd | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| NCC Group Security Services Limited | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| ARAGORN HOSTING LTD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ARISTI LIMITED | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bridewell Consulting Limited | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| COMMISSUM ASSOCIATES LIMITED | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 8 of 22 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7280. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 16 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.