Development consultancy services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 73220000·Services · class·in Research & Development (R&D)
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 11 lots from 11 competitions run by 11 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 5 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 8) and 6 from older notices (bids received, middle 4.5).
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 74 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
73220000 Development consultancy services82 notices · 58%- Research services 419 · 12m
- Research and development consultancy services 150 · 12m
- Research consultancy services 132 · 12m
- Research and experimental development services 50 · 12m
- Design and execution of research and development 14 · 12m
- Test and evaluation 9 · 12m
- Military research and technology 7 · 12m
- Experimental development services 3 · 12m
- Research and Development services on security and defence materials 1 · 12m
- Pre-feasibility study and technological demonstration 1 · 12m
- All of Research & Development (R&D) →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Local authorities53%(72 notices)
72 of 137 notices are Local authorities (53%).Central government23%(31 notices)
31 of 137 notices are Central government (23%).Other public bodies12%(16 notices)
16 of 137 notices are Other public bodies (12%).Education & universities3%(4 notices)
4 of 137 notices are Education & universities (3%).Housing associations2%(3 notices)
3 of 137 notices are Housing associations (2%).Not classified8%(11 notices)
11 of 137 notices are Not classified (8%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canterbury City Council | Local authorities | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office | Central government | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Department for Education | Central government | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| UK Research and Innovation | Central government | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Improvement and Development Agency for Local Government (IDeA) | Other public bodies | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Ministry of Defence | Central government | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| North Hertfordshire District Council | Local authorities | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Scottish Enterprise | not classified | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London | Local authorities | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Bassetlaw District Council | Local authorities | 2 | 2 | 0 |
102 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 98 of 142 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South East England | — | — | 18% | |
| Greater London | — | 65% | 38% | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract93%(132 notices)
132 of 142 notices are Contract (93%).Framework7%(10 notices)
10 of 142 notices are Framework (7%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open39%(55 notices)
55 of 142 notices are Open (39%).Limited / restricted23%(32 notices)
32 of 142 notices are Limited / restricted (23%).Direct award19%(27 notices)
27 of 142 notices are Direct award (19%).Route not published14%(20 notices)
20 of 142 notices are Route not published (14%).Selective6%(8 notices)
8 of 142 notices are Selective (6%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold27%(6 notices)
6 of 22 notices are Above threshold (27%).Below threshold73%(16 notices)
16 of 22 notices are Below threshold (73%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (96) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid9%(1)
1 of 11 lots fall in 1 bid (9%).2–327%(3)
3 of 11 lots fall in 2–3 (27%).4–69%(1)
1 of 11 lots fall in 4–6 (9%).7 or more55%(6)
6 of 11 lots fall in 7 or more (55%).
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 11 lots from 11 competitions run by 11 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 5 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 8) and 6 from older notices (bids received, middle 4.5).
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
27 of 84 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 12 more give no procedure and are left out.
i
What share of bids come from small and medium firms.
SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.
15 SME bids out of 57, on 9 lots where the buyer published the split.
i
What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.
Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.
29 of 51 awards where the winner declared its size.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
i
How often a tender ends with no award.
Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.
1 of 96 notices, last 36 months.
Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 118 awards to 105 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 12% of contract awards in the last 36 months
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| WSP UK Limited | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Land Use Consultants | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Montagu-Evans LLP | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| BCVS | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| We Made That | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| innoQ Deutschland GmbH | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 45 of 142 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7322. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 20 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.