Metro Dynamics Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Companies House: Private Limited Company·London·Greater London·Main market: Business and management consultancy services
Official UK PPONPWRH-9835-QRRM
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
32 awards (27 for a named lot, 84%, 5 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 32 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7941 Business and management consultancy services5 awards · 16% · awards naming a lot7940 Business and management consultancy and related services4 awards · 13% · awards naming a lot7311 Research services1 awards · 3% · awards naming a lot7320 Research and development consultancy services1 awards · 3% · awards naming a lot7321 Research consultancy services1 awards · 3% · awards naming a lot7322 Development consultancy services1 awards · 3% · awards naming a lot7130 Engineering services1 awards · 3% · whole-procedure awardsi
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMCA2037 Growth of Greater Manchester and the Role of Transport Consultancy Services | Greater Manchester Combined Authority | — | 4 mo | £125,000 † |
| Accelerating Development of Local Investment Opportunities | Department for Business & Trade | — | 3 mo | £115,800 † |
| Get People Working Consultancy | Cheshire west and Chester Borough Council | — | 4 mo | £79,130 † |
| Improving funding allocation to places for Levelling Up. | THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM | — | 3 mo | £60,930 † |
| CONSULTANCY SUPPORT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONS REVIEW (EDFR) | WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED | — | 5 mo | £60,000 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 24 of 24 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority78%(25 awards)
25 of 32 awards are Local authority (78%).Central government13%(4 awards)
4 of 32 awards are Central government (13%).Other public body6%(2 awards)
2 of 32 awards are Other public body (6%).Education3%(1 awards)
1 of 32 awards are Education (3%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater Manchester Combined Authority | 5 | 20.8% | 5 | 10 Aug 2026 |
| West Midlands Combined Authority | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 21 Nov 2025 |
| Belfast City Council | 1 | 4.2% | 4 | 6 Mar 2023 |
| Liverpool City Region Combined Authority | 1 | 4.2% | 3 | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Tees Valley Combined Authority | 1 | 4.2% | 3 | 1 Feb 2022 |
| Manchester City Council | 1 | 4.2% | 2 | 15 Aug 2023 |
| Department for Business & Trade | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 8 May 2025 |
| Cheshire west and Chester Borough Council | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 12 Jun 2025 |
Share = of the 24 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
27 of 32 awards carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| UKRI-6254 Independent Review | 31 Oct 2026 | £50,000 |
| Lot 3: Baltic Ventures Tech Accelerator | 31 Dec 2026 | £38,973 |
| Lot 1: LYVA Labs (phases 1 and 2) | 31 Jan 2027 | £31,109 |
| Lot 2: Flexible Growth Fund | 31 Jan 2027 | £34,645 |
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 32 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 21 of 32 awards, estimated from the published duration on 6 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.