Glass: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 14820000·Supplies · class·in Mining, basic metals and related products
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
14820000 Glass21 notices · 81%- Alloys 14 · 12m
- Gravel, sand, crushed stone and aggregates 9 · 12m
- Rock salt 9 · 12m
- Slag, dross, ferrous waste and scrap 3 · 12m
- Aluminium, nickel, scandium, titanium and vanadium 3 · 12m
- Metal ores and alloys 2 · 12m
- Cadmium, lutetium, hafnium, tantalum and tungsten 2 · 12m
- Gallium 2 · 12m
- Precious and semi-precious stones, pumice stone, emery, natural abrasives, other minerals and precious metals 1 · 12m
- Caesium, strontium, rubidium and calcium 1 · 12m
- All of Mining, basic metals and related products →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Local authorities35%(9 notices)
9 of 26 notices are Local authorities (35%).Other public bodies27%(7 notices)
7 of 26 notices are Other public bodies (27%).Central government19%(5 notices)
5 of 26 notices are Central government (19%).Education & universities4%(1 notices)
1 of 26 notices are Education & universities (4%).Police, fire & emergency4%(1 notices)
1 of 26 notices are Police, fire & emergency (4%).Not classified12%(3 notices)
3 of 26 notices are Not classified (12%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City & County of Swansea | Local authorities | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| City Building (Glasgow) LLP | not classified | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| The Guinness Partnership | Other public bodies | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Northern Ireland Housing Executive | Central government | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC | Other public bodies | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| UK Research and Innovation | Central government | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Bristol City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Bromford Flagship LiveWest Limited | Other public bodies | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| City of Doncaster Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
17 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 23 of 26 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| South East England | — | — | — | |
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract77%(20 notices)
20 of 26 notices are Contract (77%).Framework19%(5 notices)
5 of 26 notices are Framework (19%).Dynamic purchasing system4%(1 notices)
1 of 26 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (4%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open54%(14 notices)
14 of 26 notices are Open (54%).Limited / restricted15%(4 notices)
4 of 26 notices are Limited / restricted (15%).Direct award12%(3 notices)
3 of 26 notices are Direct award (12%).Route not published12%(3 notices)
3 of 26 notices are Route not published (12%).Selective8%(2 notices)
2 of 26 notices are Selective (8%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold60%(3 notices)
3 of 5 notices are Above threshold (60%).Below threshold40%(2 notices)
2 of 5 notices are Below threshold (40%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 52 awards to 21 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXCEL GLASS LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Ashton glass Ltd | 1 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| Chipping Norton Glass | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Clayton Glass | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Kwiktuf Ltd | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1ST STOP GLASS LIMITED | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Architectural Armour Limited | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Askew Glass | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 9 of 26 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 1482. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 19 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.