Restaurant and food-serving services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 55300000Services · classin Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services

Open now4open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months1515 contracting authorities · 68 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot35 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 5 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 4 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2.5) and 1 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities42%(28 notices)
    28 of 67 notices are Local authorities (42%).
  • Other public bodies7%(5 notices)
    5 of 67 notices are Other public bodies (7%).
  • Central government7%(5 notices)
    5 of 67 notices are Central government (7%).
  • Education & universities6%(4 notices)
    4 of 67 notices are Education & universities (6%).
  • Charities1%(1 notices)
    1 of 67 notices are Charities (1%).
  • Not classified36%(24 notices)
    24 of 67 notices are Not classified (36%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Forestry Englandnot classified900
LONDON LUTON AIRPORT OPERATIONS LIMITEDnot classified900
Forestry CommissionOther public bodies510
NI Assemblynot classified500
Belfast City CouncilLocal authorities300
The Mayor's Office for Policing And CrimeCentral government200
University of CumbriaEducation & universities200
Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough CouncilLocal authorities100
Bath & North East Somerset CouncilLocal authorities110
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilLocal authorities110

40 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 58 of 68 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
East of England17 · 29%———
South West England13 · 22%———
North West England12 · 21%———
Northern Ireland8 · 14%———
South East England8 · 14%———
East Midlands6 · 10%———
North East England6 · 10%———
Greater London5 · 9%———
Yorkshire and the Humber3 · 5%———
West Midlands3 · 5%———
Wales (Cymru)2 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(63 notices)
    63 of 68 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework6%(4 notices)
    4 of 68 notices are Framework (6%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(1 notices)
    1 of 68 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open47%(32 notices)
    32 of 68 notices are Open (47%).
  • Route not published37%(25 notices)
    25 of 68 notices are Route not published (37%).
  • Selective15%(10 notices)
    10 of 68 notices are Selective (15%).
  • Limited / restricted1%(1 notices)
    1 of 68 notices are Limited / restricted (1%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold26%(5 notices)
    5 of 19 notices are Above threshold (26%).
  • Below threshold74%(14 notices)
    14 of 19 notices are Below threshold (74%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

39 daysrobust · n=22middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (20) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from 5 competitions run by 5 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 4 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2.5) and 1 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

3robust · n=5middle half 2–3
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

16 of 17 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 3 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

94%robust · n=17
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

70%robust · n=10winner registered in the delivery region
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

0 of 20 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

0%robust · n=20

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 25 awards to 22 suppliers

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 29 of 68 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

JAGGAER / BravoSolution7 notices · 24%
Proactis / ProContract6 notices · 21%
Delta eSourcing1 notices · 3%
eTendersNI1 notices · 3%
Sell2Wales1 notices · 3%
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 5530. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 27 Aug 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.