Telephone and data transmission services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 64210000Services · classin Postal and telecommunications services

Open now6open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months9574 contracting authorities · 230 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot213% single-bid · 12 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 15 lots from 12 competitions run by 12 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 8 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2.5) and 7 from older notices (bids received, middle 2).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£92,216middle value of 89 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 89 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government43%(95 notices)
    95 of 219 notices are Central government (43%).
  • Local authorities19%(41 notices)
    41 of 219 notices are Local authorities (19%).
  • Other public bodies16%(36 notices)
    36 of 219 notices are Other public bodies (16%).
  • Education & universities7%(16 notices)
    16 of 219 notices are Education & universities (7%).
  • NHS & health4%(8 notices)
    8 of 219 notices are NHS & health (4%).
  • Not classified11%(23 notices)
    23 of 219 notices are Not classified (11%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeCentral government1670
Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCentral government440
JiscOther public bodies410
Northampton General Hospital NHS TrustCentral government420
Scottish GovernmentCentral government420
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustCentral government330
Financial Conduct Authoritynot classified330
GreensquareaccordCentral government310
HM Revenue & CustomsCentral government300
Home Office - Digital Data & Technology (DDaT)Central government300

166 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 135 of 230 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Greater London33 · 24%—41%43%
Yorkshire and the Humber33 · 24%—42%0%
East of England33 · 24%642%9%
East Midlands29 · 21%—40%9%
North West England29 · 21%—42%17%
South East England28 · 21%—42%27%
South West England27 · 20%—44%9%
West Midlands27 · 20%—47%0%
North East England24 · 18%—53%5%
Scotland19 · 14%———
Wales (Cymru)14 · 10%———
Northern Ireland4 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(211 notices)
    211 of 230 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(19 notices)
    19 of 230 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted25%(57 notices)
    57 of 230 notices are Limited / restricted (25%).
  • Route not published24%(55 notices)
    55 of 230 notices are Route not published (24%).
  • Open23%(54 notices)
    54 of 230 notices are Open (23%).
  • Direct award17%(40 notices)
    40 of 230 notices are Direct award (17%).
  • Selective10%(24 notices)
    24 of 230 notices are Selective (10%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold75%(27 notices)
    27 of 36 notices are Above threshold (75%).
  • Below threshold25%(9 notices)
    9 of 36 notices are Below threshold (25%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

31 daysrobust · n=25middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (118) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=15
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid13%(2)
    2 of 15 lots fall in 1 bid (13%).
  • 2–347%(7)
    7 of 15 lots fall in 2–3 (47%).
  • 4–620%(3)
    3 of 15 lots fall in 4–6 (20%).
  • 7 or more20%(3)
    3 of 15 lots fall in 7 or more (20%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £37,056middle value £92,216p75 £288,822
interquartile range of 89 awards · p90 £688,909
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 15 lots from 12 competitions run by 12 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 8 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2.5) and 7 from older notices (bids received, middle 2).

Last 36 months.

2robust · n=12middle half 2–6
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

30 of 112 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 6 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

27%robust · n=112
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

22 SME bids out of 44, on 12 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

50%robust · n=44
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

17 of 78 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

22%robust · n=78
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

53%robust · n=59winner registered in the delivery region
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

0 of 118 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

0%robust · n=118

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 159 awards to 111 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 26% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 56 of 230 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 6421. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.