Repair and maintenance services of machinery: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 50530000Services · classin Repair & Maintenance

Open now32open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months192130 contracting authorities · 494 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot423% single-bid · 80 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 108 lots from 80 competitions run by 70 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 59 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 49 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£115,100middle value of 209 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 209 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award47 daysmiddle value · 43 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 43 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 32 open for bids now · newest first

See all 32 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government30%(142 notices)
    142 of 467 notices are Central government (30%).
  • Other public bodies23%(107 notices)
    107 of 467 notices are Other public bodies (23%).
  • Local authorities21%(100 notices)
    100 of 467 notices are Local authorities (21%).
  • Education & universities8%(38 notices)
    38 of 467 notices are Education & universities (8%).
  • Housing associations6%(28 notices)
    28 of 467 notices are Housing associations (6%).
  • Not classified11%(52 notices)
    52 of 467 notices are Not classified (11%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Sellafield LimitedOther public bodies27100
UK Research and InnovationCentral government2790
Nuclear Restoration Services LimitedOther public bodies1060
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS TrustCentral government881
United Utilities Water LimitedOther public bodies710
City of Bradford Metropolitan District CouncilLocal authorities650
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeCentral government610
NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)Central government600
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardEducation & universities500
Cardiff UniversityEducation & universities500

282 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 358 of 494 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Scotland80 · 22%492%87%
South East England54 · 15%686%42%
North West England51 · 14%435%46%
Wales (Cymru)50 · 14%2—31%
Greater London41 · 11%362%18%
South West England40 · 11%481%42%
East Midlands39 · 11%573%21%
Yorkshire and the Humber39 · 11%164%32%
West Midlands37 · 10%585%35%
East of England33 · 9%464%30%
North East England29 · 8%———
Northern Ireland11 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(444 notices)
    444 of 494 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework9%(46 notices)
    46 of 494 notices are Framework (9%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(4 notices)
    4 of 494 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open50%(246 notices)
    246 of 494 notices are Open (50%).
  • Direct award20%(100 notices)
    100 of 494 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Route not published12%(58 notices)
    58 of 494 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Selective11%(52 notices)
    52 of 494 notices are Selective (11%).
  • Limited / restricted8%(38 notices)
    38 of 494 notices are Limited / restricted (8%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold69%(77 notices)
    77 of 112 notices are Above threshold (69%).
  • Below threshold31%(35 notices)
    35 of 112 notices are Below threshold (31%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

30 daysrobust · n=90middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (277) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=108
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid23%(25)
    25 of 108 lots fall in 1 bid (23%).
  • 2–327%(29)
    29 of 108 lots fall in 2–3 (27%).
  • 4–631%(34)
    34 of 108 lots fall in 4–6 (31%).
  • 7 or more19%(20)
    20 of 108 lots fall in 7 or more (19%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £39,750middle value £115,100p75 £381,877
interquartile range of 209 awards · p90 £1,054,591
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 108 lots from 80 competitions run by 70 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 59 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 49 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=80middle half 2–6
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

143 of 269 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 8 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

53%robust · n=269
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

339 SME bids out of 418, on 97 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

81%robust · n=418
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

80 of 118 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

68%robust · n=118
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

61%robust · n=153winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 65 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

at the estimaterobust · n=6525 below · 11 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

11 of 277 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

4%robust · n=277
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 7 lots from 7 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

2robust · n=720 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 406 awards to 296 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 10% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 231 of 494 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)56 notices · 24% · 2 open
Proactis / ProContract24 notices · 10%
Sell2Wales24 notices · 10% · 1 open
Delta eSourcing21 notices · 9% · 1 open
Atamis Health Family Portal19 notices · 8% · 1 open
JAGGAER / BravoSolution14 notices · 6%

Open tenders in repair and maintenance services of…

32 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 32 open notices with CPV 5053… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 5053. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 26 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.