Repair and maintenance services of electrical and mechanical building installations: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 50710000Services · classin Repair & Maintenance

Open now32open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months240137 contracting authorities · 645 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot68% single-bid · 113 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 145 lots from 113 competitions run by 91 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 65 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 5) and 80 from older notices (bids received, middle 6.5).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£203,658middle value of 238 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 238 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award60 daysmiddle value · 58 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 58 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 32 open for bids now · newest first

See all 32 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities28%(166 notices)
    166 of 601 notices are Local authorities (28%).
  • Other public bodies24%(142 notices)
    142 of 601 notices are Other public bodies (24%).
  • Central government18%(108 notices)
    108 of 601 notices are Central government (18%).
  • Education & universities13%(81 notices)
    81 of 601 notices are Education & universities (13%).
  • Housing associations7%(40 notices)
    40 of 601 notices are Housing associations (7%).
  • Not classified11%(64 notices)
    64 of 601 notices are Not classified (11%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
NORWICH CITY SERVICES LIMITEDOther public bodies58520
UK Research and InnovationCentral government2480
Somerset NHS Foundation TrustCentral government11110
Dundee City CouncilLocal authorities700
Nottingham University Hospital NHS TrustCentral government760
BLACKPOOL COUNCILLocal authorities610
Falkirk CouncilLocal authorities610
Nottingham City Campus, Hucknall Roadnot classified600
Portsmouth City CouncilLocal authorities600
Salvation Army Housing AssociationHousing associations630

334 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 558 of 645 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
East of England121 · 22%634%47%
South East England96 · 17%570%41%
Greater London92 · 16%857%17%
East Midlands83 · 15%660%32%
Scotland82 · 15%888%96%
South West England74 · 13%686%26%
North West England65 · 12%6—52%
Yorkshire and the Humber52 · 9%683%35%
West Midlands46 · 8%———
Wales (Cymru)39 · 7%———
North East England39 · 7%———
Northern Ireland20 · 4%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract88%(570 notices)
    570 of 645 notices are Contract (88%).
  • Framework11%(70 notices)
    70 of 645 notices are Framework (11%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(5 notices)
    5 of 645 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open53%(343 notices)
    343 of 645 notices are Open (53%).
  • Direct award17%(109 notices)
    109 of 645 notices are Direct award (17%).
  • Route not published13%(81 notices)
    81 of 645 notices are Route not published (13%).
  • Selective12%(77 notices)
    77 of 645 notices are Selective (12%).
  • Limited / restricted5%(35 notices)
    35 of 645 notices are Limited / restricted (5%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold82%(120 notices)
    120 of 147 notices are Above threshold (82%).
  • Below threshold18%(27 notices)
    27 of 147 notices are Below threshold (18%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

32 daysrobust · n=148middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (355) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=145
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid8%(11)
    11 of 145 lots fall in 1 bid (8%).
  • 2–317%(25)
    25 of 145 lots fall in 2–3 (17%).
  • 4–634%(49)
    49 of 145 lots fall in 4–6 (34%).
  • 7 or more41%(60)
    60 of 145 lots fall in 7 or more (41%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £48,758middle value £203,658p75 £882,750
interquartile range of 238 awards · p90 £7,500,000
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 145 lots from 113 competitions run by 91 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 65 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 5) and 80 from older notices (bids received, middle 6.5).

Last 36 months.

6robust · n=113middle half 4–10
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

209 of 346 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 9 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

60%robust · n=346
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

730 SME bids out of 878, on 131 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

83%robust · n=878
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

103 of 156 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

66%robust · n=156
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

59%robust · n=198winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 61 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

at the estimaterobust · n=6126 below · 8 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

13 of 355 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

4%robust · n=355
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 17 lots from 12 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=1224 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 472 awards to 304 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 14% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 301 of 645 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)61 notices · 20% · 1 open
In-tend Electronic Procurement53 notices · 18% · 4 open
Proactis / ProContract53 notices · 18% · 4 open
Sell2Wales25 notices · 8%
Delta eSourcing24 notices · 8% · 1 open
Atamis Health Family Portal22 notices · 7% · 1 open
JAGGAER / BravoSolution14 notices · 5%

Open tenders in repair and maintenance services of…

32 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 32 open notices with CPV 5071… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 5071. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.