Snow-clearing services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 90620000Services · classin Cleaning & Environmental Services

Open now5open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months88 contracting authorities · 70 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot67% single-bid · 8 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from 8 competitions run by 8 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 6 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 8 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£141,668middle value of 12 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 12 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

2 of 5 open for bids now · newest first

See all 5 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities46%(32 notices)
    32 of 70 notices are Local authorities (46%).
  • Central government17%(12 notices)
    12 of 70 notices are Central government (17%).
  • Education & universities14%(10 notices)
    10 of 70 notices are Education & universities (14%).
  • Other public bodies10%(7 notices)
    7 of 70 notices are Other public bodies (10%).
  • NHS & health7%(5 notices)
    5 of 70 notices are NHS & health (7%).
  • Not classified6%(4 notices)
    4 of 70 notices are Not classified (6%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardEducation & universities500
Cumbria County CouncilLocal authorities300
Derbyshire County CouncilLocal authorities300
The City of Edinburgh CouncilLocal authorities300
Westmorland and Furness CouncilLocal authorities300
Borough Council of CalderdaleLocal authorities200
City of Bradford Metropolitan District CouncilLocal authorities200
Comhairle nan Eilean Siarnot classified200
Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership TrustNHS & health200
Kirklees CouncilLocal authorities200

48 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 63 of 70 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Scotland14 · 22%———
Yorkshire and the Humber10 · 16%———
North West England9 · 14%———
Wales (Cymru)9 · 14%———
South East England7 · 11%———
East Midlands6 · 10%———
North East England5 · 8%———
East of England4 · 6%———
Northern Ireland4 · 6%———
Greater London3 · 5%———
West Midlands3 · 5%———
South West England2 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract61%(43 notices)
    43 of 70 notices are Contract (61%).
  • Framework39%(27 notices)
    27 of 70 notices are Framework (39%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open83%(58 notices)
    58 of 70 notices are Open (83%).
  • Selective6%(4 notices)
    4 of 70 notices are Selective (6%).
  • Limited / restricted4%(3 notices)
    3 of 70 notices are Limited / restricted (4%).
  • Route not published4%(3 notices)
    3 of 70 notices are Route not published (4%).
  • Direct award3%(2 notices)
    2 of 70 notices are Direct award (3%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold64%(14 notices)
    14 of 22 notices are Above threshold (64%).
  • Below threshold36%(8 notices)
    8 of 22 notices are Below threshold (36%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

30 daysrobust · n=20middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (24) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=14
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid7%(1)
    1 of 14 lots fall in 1 bid (7%).
  • 2–314%(2)
    2 of 14 lots fall in 2–3 (14%).
  • 4–643%(6)
    6 of 14 lots fall in 4–6 (43%).
  • 7 or more36%(5)
    5 of 14 lots fall in 7 or more (36%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £62,850middle value £141,668p75 £237,845
interquartile range of 12 awards · p90 £321,786
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from 8 competitions run by 8 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 6 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 8 from older notices (bids received, middle 6).

Last 36 months.

6robust · n=8middle half 4–8
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

20 of 23 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 1 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

87%robust · n=23
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

39 SME bids out of 56, on 11 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

70%robust · n=56
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

57%robust · n=14winner registered in the delivery region
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

1 of 24 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

4%robust · n=24
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 22 lots from 5 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=511 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 108 awards to 67 suppliers

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 50 of 70 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract11 notices · 22%
Sell2Wales8 notices · 16%
MultiQuote Sourcing Portal3 notices · 6% · 1 open
eTendersNI2 notices · 4% · 1 open

Open tenders in snow-clearing services

5 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 5 open notices with CPV 9062… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 9062. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.